Trial reportAmerican journal of preventive medicine2009
Impact of a brief motivational smoking cessation intervention the Get PHIT randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in American journal of preventive medicine, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00169260 (Proactive Cessation Intervention With Biomarker Feedback), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Proactive Cessation Intervention With Biomarker Feedback
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The Effectiveness and Harms of Screening for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of Korean medical science · 2022Pooled it
- Exercise interventions for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Biomedical risk assessment as an aid for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Interventions for recruiting smokers into cessation programmes.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012Pooled it
- Questions about quitting (Q2): design and methods of a Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST) randomized screening experiment for an online, motivational smoking cessation intervention.Contemporary clinical trials · 2012Trial
- Effectiveness of a structured motivational intervention including smoking cessation advice and spirometry information in the primary care setting: the ESPITAP study.BMC public health · 2011Trial
- Impact of spirometry feedback and brief motivational counseling on long-term smoking outcomes: a comparison of smokers with and without lung impairment.Patient education and counseling · 2010Trial
- Smoking cessation intervention for Indigenous pregnant women: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.Preventive medicine reports · 2026Review
- Assessment of a Personal Interactive Carbon Monoxide Breath Sensor in People Who Smoke Cigarettes: Single-Arm Cohort Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Article
- Joint Indian Chest Society-National College of Chest Physicians (India) guidelines for spirometry.Lung India : official organ of Indian Chest Society · 2019Article
- A Brief Smoking Cessation Intervention for Heavy Drinking Smokers: Treatment Feasibility and Acceptability.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2018Article
- Design Considerations for mHealth Programs Targeting Smokers Not Yet Ready to Quit: Results of a Sequential Mixed-Methods Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2017Article
- Screening for COPD: the gap between logic and evidence.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2017Review
- “Hike up yer skirt, and quit.” what motivates and supports smoking cessation in builders and renovators.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2013Article
- Newer equations better predict lung age in smokers: a retrospective analysis using a cohort of randomly selected participants.Primary care respiratory journal : journal of the General Practice Airways Group · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFew studies have rigorously evaluated whether providing biologically based health-risk feedback is more effective than standard interventions in increasing smokers' motivation to quit and their long-term abstinence.
designAn RCT was conducted from 2005 to 2008. Data were analyzed in 2008. SETTING/
participantsSmokers (N=536) were recruited from the community, regardless of their interest in quitting smoking.
interventionSmokers either received brief ( approximately 20 minutes), personally tailored counseling sessions based on their lung functioning, carbon monoxide (CO) exposure, and smoking-related health conditions, or they received generic smoking-risk information and personalized counseling about their diet, BMI, and physical activity. All were advised to quit smoking and were offered access to a free phone-counseling program.
main outcome measuresTreatment utilization and abstinence at 6 and 12 months post-intervention.
resultsParticipants who received the experimental treatment demonstrated no greater motivation to quit, use of treatment services, or abstinence compared to controls at either follow-up assessment. In fact, controls reported greater motivation to quit at 12 months (M 3.42 vs 3.20, p=0.03), greater use of pharmacotherapy at 6 months (37.8% vs 28.0%, p=0.02), and greater 30-day point prevalent abstinence at 6 months, after controlling for relevant covariates (10.8% vs 6.4%, adjusted p=0.04).
conclusionsThe present study found no support for adding a personalized health-risk assessment emphasizing lung health and CO exposure to generic cessation advice and counseling for community-based smokers not otherwise seeking treatment.
trial registrationNCT00169260.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.