Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19524285›Full record

Trial reportGynecologic oncology2009

Prognostic relevance of c-MYC gene amplification and polysomy for chromosome 8 in suboptimally-resected, advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancers: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

Kathleen M Darcy, William E Brady, Jan K Blancato, Robert B Dickson, William J Hoskins, William P McGuire, Michael J Birrer

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Gynecologic oncology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. c-MYC and Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. miRNA profiling along tumour progression in ovarian carcinoma.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2011
    Article
  19. Modeling high-grade serous ovarian carcinogenesis from the fallopian tube.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2011
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kathleen M DarcyGOG Statistical and Data Center, Buffalo, NY 14263-0001, USA.
William E Brady
Jan K Blancato
Robert B Dickson
William J Hoskins
William P McGuire
Michael J Birrer

Funding

GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY GROUP HEADQUARTERSU10CA027469 · NCI · GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY GROUP · PI DISAIA, PHILIP J. · 1985 to 2013
$132.6M
Tissue Culture Shared ResourceP30CA051008 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI STEPHEN W BYERS · 1990 to 2026
$71.5M
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY GROUP STATISTICAL OFFICEU10CA037517 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI BLESSING, JOHN A · 1985 to 2013
$67.4M
Increasing Minority Participation in Cancer Prevention and ControlR25CA129035 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA · PI BLANCATO, JAN K, COUSIN, CAROLYN EVANS · 2008 to 2012
$1.6M
Intramural NIH HHSNCI NIH HHS CA 27469NCI NIH HHS CA 37517NCI NIH HHS P30 CA051008NCI NIH HHS R25 CA129035NCI NIH HHS U10 CA027469NCI NIH HHS U10 CA037517
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) examined the prognostic relevance of c-MYC amplification and polysomy 8 in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).

methodsWomen with suboptimally-resected, advanced stage EOC who participated in GOG-111, a multicenter randomized phase III trial of cyclophosphamide+cisplatin vs. paclitaxel+cisplatin, and who provided a tumor block through GOG-9404 were eligible. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with probes for c-MYC and the centromere of chromosome 8 (CEP8) was used to examine c-MYC amplification (> or =2 copies c-MYC/CEP8) and polysomy 8 (> or =4 CEP8 copies).

resultsc-MYC amplification, defined as > or =2 copies c-MYC/CEP8, was observed in 29% (28/97) of EOCs and levels were ranged from 2.0-3.3 copies of c-MYC/CEP8. c-MYC amplification was not associated with patient age, race, GOG performance status, stage, cell type, grade, measurable disease status following surgery, tumor response or disease status following platinum-based combination chemotherapy. Women with vs. without c-MYC amplification did not have an increased risk of disease progression (hazard ratio [HR]=1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.65-1.64; p=0.884) or death (HR=1.08; 95% CI=0.68-1.72; p=0.745). c-MYC amplification was not an independent prognostic factor for progression-free survival (HR=1.03, 95% CI=0.57-1.85; p=0.922) or overall survival (HR=1.01, 95% CI=0.56-1.80; p=0.982). Similar insignificant results were obtained for c-MYC amplification categorized as > or =1.5 copies c-MYC/CEP8. Polysomy 8 was observed in 22 patients without c-MYC amplification and 3 with c-MYC amplification, and was associated with age and measurable disease status, but not other clinical covariates or outcomes.

conclusionsc-MYC amplification and polysomy 8 have limited predictive or prognostic value in suboptimally-resected, advanced stage EOC treated with platinum-based combination chemotherapy.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, Human, Pair 8Genes, mycAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCisplatinCyclophosphamideFemaleGene AmplificationHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingOvarian NeoplasmsPaclitaxelTreatment OutcomeCisplatinCyclophosphamidePaclitaxel

Identifiers

PMID19524285
PMCPMC5806536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.