Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19523535›Full record

ArticleClinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association2009

Comparison of noninvasive markers of fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Amy G Shah, Alison Lydecker, Karen Murray, Brent N Tetri, Melissa J Contos, Arun J Sanyal, Nash Clinical Research Network

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 831 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
831citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

831 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

771 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Amy G ShahDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
Alison Lydecker
Karen Murray
Brent N Tetri
Melissa J Contos
Arun J Sanyal
Nash Clinical Research Network

Funding

Pediatric Trials in Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH)U01DK061734 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI ROHIT LOOMBA · 2002 to 2026
$24.4M
Continuation of the Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis Clinical Research Network (NASHU01DK061730 · NIDDK · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI TONASCIA, JAMES A · 2002 to 2018
$23.2M
Non Alcoholic Steatohepatitis Clinical Research NetworkU01DK061732 · NIDDK · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI Srinivasan Dasarathy · 2002 to 2026
$12.2M
The Saint Louis University Component of the NASH CRNU01DK061718 · NIDDK · SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY · PI BRENT A NEUSCHWANDER-TETRI · 2002 to 2026
$12.0M
Nonalcoholic Steatohepatittis Clinical Research Network (NASH CRN)U01DK061731 · NIDDK · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI ARUN J SANYAL · 2002 to 2026
$11.2M
Pathogenesis, prognosis, and treatment of NAFLD patientsU01DK061713 · NIDDK · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ANNA MAE ELIZABETH DIEHL · 2002 to 2026
$10.3M
Collaborative Clinical Research on Non Alcoholic StratohepatitisU01DK061737 · NIDDK · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI NAGA P CHALASANI · 2002 to 2026
$10.2M
Clinical Research Network in Non-Alcoholic SteatohepatitisU01DK061728 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI KRIS KOWDLEY · 2002 to 2026
$9.0M
Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Clinical Research Network (NASH CRN)U01DK061738 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Norah A. Terrault · 2002 to 2026
$8.9M
NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK061713NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK061718NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK061728NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK061730NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK061731NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK061732NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK061734NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK061737NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK061738NIDDK NIH HHS U01DK61713NIDDK NIH HHS U01DK61718NIDDK NIH HHS U01DK61728NIDDK NIH HHS U01DK61730NIDDK NIH HHS U01DK61731NIDDK NIH HHS U01DK61732NIDDK NIH HHS U01DK61734NIDDK NIH HHS U01DK61737NIDDK NIH HHS U01DK61738
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND &

aimsThere is a need for a reliable and inexpensive noninvasive marker of hepatic fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). We compared the performance of the FIB4 index (based on age, aspartate aminotransferase [AST] and alanine aminotransferase [ALT] levels, and platelet counts) with 6 other non-invasive markers of fibrosis in patients with NAFLD.

methodsUsing a nation-wide database of 541 adults with NAFLD, jackknife-validated areas under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROC) of FIB4 and 7 other markers were compared. The sensitivity at 90% specificity, 80% positive predictive value, and 90% negative predictive values were determined along with cutoffs for advanced fibrosis.

resultsThe median FIB4 score was 1.11 (interquartile range = 0.74-1.67). The jackknife-validated AUROC for FIB4 was 0.802 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.758-0.847), which was higher than that of the NAFLD fibrosis score (0.768; 95% CI, 0.720-0.816; P = .09), Goteburg University Cirrhosis Index (0.743; 95% CI, 0.695-0.791; P < .01), AST:ALT ratio (0.742; 95% CI, 0.690-0.794; P < .015), AST:platelet ratio index (0.730; 95% CI, 0.681-0.779; P < .001), AST:platelet ratio (0.720; 95% CI, 0.669-0.770; P < .001), body mass index, AST:ALT, diabetes (BARD) score (0.70; P < .001), or cirrhosis discriminant score (0.666; 95% CI, 0.614-0.718; P < .001). For a fixed specificity of 90% (FIB4 = 1.93), the sensitivity in identifying advanced fibrosis was only 50% (95% CI, 46-55). A FIB4 > or = 2.67 had an 80% positive predictive value and a FIB4 index < or = 1.30 had a 90% negative predictive value.

conclusionsThe FIB4 index is superior to 7 other noninvasive markers of fibrosis in patients with NAFLD; however its performance characteristics highlight the need for even better noninvasive markers.

Indexed as

Diagnostic Techniques and ProceduresAdultAge FactorsAlanine TransaminaseAspartate AminotransferasesBiomarkersFatty LiverFemaleHumansLiver CirrhosisMaleMiddle AgedPlatelet CountPredictive Value of TestsROC CurveAlanine TransaminaseAspartate AminotransferasesBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID19523535
PMCPMC3079239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.