Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19523523›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2009

Tractography-based priors for dynamic causal models.

Klaas Enno Stephan, Marc Tittgemeyer, Thomas R Knösche, Rosalyn J Moran, Karl J Friston

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 156 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Explainable Contrastive Multiview Graph Representation of Brain, Mind, and Behavior.Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  15. Whole-Brain Modelling: Past, Present, and Future.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Klaas Enno StephanInstitute for Empirical Research in Economics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. k.stephan@iew.uzh.ch
Marc Tittgemeyer
Thomas R Knösche
Rosalyn J Moran
Karl J Friston
University College London · GBMax Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences · DEMax Planck Institute for Metabolism Research · DE

Funding

Wellcome Trust 056750Wellcome Trust 088130
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional integration in the brain rests on anatomical connectivity (the presence of axonal connections) and effective connectivity (the causal influences mediated by these connections). The deployment of anatomical connections provides important constraints on effective connectivity, but does not fully determine it, because synaptic connections can be expressed functionally in a dynamic and context-dependent fashion. Although it is generally assumed that anatomical connectivity data is important to guide the construction of neurobiologically realistic models of effective connectivity; the degree to which these models actually profit from anatomical constraints has not yet been formally investigated. Here, we use diffusion weighted imaging and probabilistic tractography to specify anatomically informed priors for dynamic causal models (DCMs) of fMRI data. We constructed 64 alternative DCMs, which embodied different mappings between the probability of an anatomical connection and the prior variance of the corresponding of effective connectivity, and fitted them to empirical fMRI data from 12 healthy subjects. Using Bayesian model selection, we show that the best model is one in which anatomical probability increases the prior variance of effective connectivity parameters in a nonlinear and monotonic (sigmoidal) fashion. This means that the higher the likelihood that a given connection exists anatomically, the larger one should set the prior variance of the corresponding coupling parameter; hence making it easier for the parameter to deviate from zero and represent a strong effective connection. To our knowledge, this study provides the first formal evidence that probabilistic knowledge of anatomical connectivity can improve models of functional integration.

Indexed as

Models, AnatomicModels, NeurologicalAdultBrainCausalityComputer SimulationDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNerve Fibers, MyelinatedYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID19523523
PMCPMC2728433
OpenAlexW2079095593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.