Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19521791›Full record

ArticleCytotechnology2009

Development of an in vitro culture method for cells and tissues from the zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha).

Brian Quinn, Mark J Costello, Germaine Dorange, James G Wilson, Carmel Mothersill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cytotechnology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The use of insect cell line Sf21 for ecotoxicity testing.Ecotoxicology (London, England) · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. From the raw bar to the bench: Bivalves as models for human health.Developmental and comparative immunology · 2019
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Primary culture of mantle cells of bivalve mollusc, Paphia malabarica.In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal · 2012
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Brian QuinnRadiation and Environmental Science Centre, Focas Institute, Dublin Institute of Technology, Kevin St., Dublin 8, Ireland, brian.quinn@gmit.ie.
Mark J Costello
Germaine Dorange
James G Wilson
Carmel Mothersill

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the successful transfer of mammalian in vitro techniques for use with fish and other vertebrates, little progress has been made in the area of invertebrate tissue culture. This paper describes the development of an in vitro technique for the culture of both cells in suspension and tissue explants from the gill, digestive gland and mantle of the zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) and their successful maintenance in culture for up to 14 days. Cell suspensions from the gills and digestive gland were the most successful technique developed with viability >80% maintained for up to 8 days in culture, suitable for use in short term toxicity tests. Tissue explants from the mantle were also maintained in culture for up to 14 days. This paper describes the challenges involved in the development of a novel in vitro culture technique for aquatic invertebrates.

Identifiers

PMID19521791
PMCPMC2698444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.