Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19521569›Full record

ReviewThe Canadian journal of cardiology2009

Risk prediction in cardiovascular disease: the prognostic significance of endothelial dysfunction.

Billie-Jean Martin, Todd J Anderson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Canadian journal of cardiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Antecubital venous endothelial ETB receptor protein expression is preserved with aging in men.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Functional Hypothalamic Amenorrhea and Preclinical Cardiovascular Disease.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Suitability of the muscle OJornal vascular brasileiro · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. The Effect of Hydro-alcoholic Extract ofInternational journal of preventive medicine · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Billie-Jean MartinDepartment of Cardiac Sciences and Libin Cardiovascular Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta.
Todd J Anderson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of new and emerging biomarkers in risk prediction has become a topic of significant interest and controversy in recent times. Currently, available models for risk prediction are reasonably good yet still misclassify a not insignificant portion of the population. The sheer number of new potential risk markers is daunting, and it is difficult to assess the importance of each one over and above the traditional risk factors. Endothelial function is one potential biomarker of risk that has been extensively studied. However, while it has demonstrated some utility in risk prediction, its use in daily clinical practice is yet to be clearly defined. The present review assesses the prognostic significance of measures of endothelial function.

Indexed as

CanadaCardiovascular DiseasesEndothelium, VascularGenetic MarkersHumansPrognosisRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID19521569
PMCPMC2787006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.