ArticlePlant signaling & behavior2006
Plant communication from biosemiotic perspective: differences in abiotic and biotic signal perception determine content arrangement of response behavior. Context determines meaning of meta-, inter- and intraorganismic plant signaling.
Article in Plant signaling & behavior, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.
- Harnessing plant-to-plant signalling via common mycorrhizal networks for enhanced community-level resistance in crops.Journal of experimental botany · 2026Review
- Plant emotion revisited: toward a new conceptual framework.Protoplasma · 2026Review
- Seed germination: influence of non-traditional regulating factors.Communicative & integrative biology · 2025Review
- The "plant neurobiology" revolution.Plant signaling & behavior · 2024Review
- Strigolactones GR-24 and Nijmegen Applications Result in Reduced Susceptibility of Tobacco and Grapevine Plantlets toPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- The Phytotoxicity ofFrontiers in plant science · 2020Article
- Concerted Flexibility of Chromatin Structure, Methylome, and Histone Modifications along with Plant Stress Responses.Biology · 2017Review
- Transcriptome analysis ofPeerJ · 2017Article
- Uniform categorization of biocommunication in bacteria, fungi and plants.World journal of biological chemistry · 2010Article
- Plant neurobiology as a paradigm shift not only in the plant sciences.Plant signaling & behavior · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As in all organisms, the evolution, development and growth of plants depends on the success of complex communication processes. These communication processes are primarily sign mediated interactions and not simply an exchange of information. They involve active coordination and active organization-conveyed by signs. A wide range of chemical substances and physical influences serve as signs.Different abiotic or biotic influences require different behaviors. Depending on the behavior, the core set of signs common to species, families, genera and organismic kingdoms is variously produced, combined and transported. This allows entirely different communication processes to be carried out with the same types of chemical molecules.Almost without exception, plant communication are parallel processes on multiple levels, (A) between plants and microorganisms, fungi, insects and other animals, (B) between different plant species as well as between members of the same plant species; (C), between cells and in cells of the plant organism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.