ArticleThe Journal of investigative dermatology2009
A mouse by any other name ...
Article in The Journal of investigative dermatology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Mouse Tumor Biology Database: A Comprehensive Resource for Mouse Models of Human Cancer.Cancer research · 2017Article
- Reproducibility of histopathological findings in experimental pathology of the mouse: a sorry tail.Lab animal · 2017Article
- Show and tell: disclosure and data sharing in experimental pathology.Disease models & mechanisms · 2016Review
- Mouse Tumor Biology (MTB): a database of mouse models for human cancer.Nucleic acids research · 2015Article
- Training pathologists in mouse pathology.Veterinary pathology · 2012Article
- Pathbase and the MPATH ontology. Community resources for mouse histopathology.Veterinary pathology · 2010Article
- Towards the integration of mouse databases - definition and implementation of solutions to two use-cases in mouse functional genomics.BMC research notes · 2010Article
- Where's the mouse info?Veterinary pathology · 2009Article
- A data-capture tool for mouse pathology phenotyping.Veterinary pathology · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A recurring motto from the Tony Blair government in the UK was "Education, Education, Education." An appropriate exhortation for the biomedical sciences would be "Standardization, Standardization, Standardization." Inevitably, the two go hand in hand, and the challenge we face is how to encourage researchers to comply with existing or emerging standard terminologies and nomenclatures. This is both an educational and a regulatory task, one in which it is vital to succeed if we are to efficiently and accurately share and use the huge volume of data emerging in the biosciences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.