Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19520018›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2009

Management of common gastrointestinal disorders: quality criteria based on patients' views and practice guidelines.

Roger Jones, Claire Hunt, Richard Stevens, Jamie Dalrymple, Richard Driscoll, Sarah Sleet, Jonathan Blanchard Smith

Abstract readMulticenter StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Faecal immunochemical testing in general practice.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2019
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Quality of care in inflammatory bowel disease.Current gastroenterology reports · 2011
    Review
  8. Participatory and evidence-informed general practice.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2009
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Roger JonesDepartment of General Practice and Primary Care, King's College London. roger.jones@kcl.ac.uk
Claire Hunt
Richard Stevens
Jamie Dalrymple
Richard Driscoll
Sarah Sleet
Jonathan Blanchard Smith

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough gastrointestinal disorders are common in general practice, clinical guidelines are not always implemented, and few patient-generated quality criteria are available to guide management.

aimTo develop quality criteria for the management of four common gastrointestinal disorders: coeliac disease, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD), inflammatory bowel disease, and irritable bowel syndrome. DESIGN OF STUDY: Qualitative study including thematic analysis of transcripts from patient focus groups and content analysis of published clinical practice guidelines. Emergent themes were synthesised by a consensus panel, into quality criteria for each condition.

settingCommunity-based practice in England, UK.

methodsFourteen focus groups were conducted (four for coeliac disease, irritable bowel syndrome, and inflammatory bowel disease, and two for GORD) involving a total of 93 patients (64 females, 29 males; mean age 55.4 years). Quality criteria were based on patients' views and expectations, synthesised with an analysis of clinical practice guidelines.

resultsA chronic disease management model was developed for each condition. Key themes included improving the timeliness and accuracy of diagnosis, appropriate use of investigations, better provision of information for patients, including access to patient organisations, better communication with, and access to, secondary care providers, and structured follow-up and regular review, particularly for coeliac disease and inflammatory bowel disease.

conclusionThis study provides a model for the development of quality markers for chronic disease management in gastroenterology, which is likely to be applicable to other chronic conditions.

Indexed as

Family PracticePatient SatisfactionQuality of Health CareAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChronic DiseaseFemaleFocus GroupsGastrointestinal DiseasesHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health Care

Identifiers

PMID19520018
PMCPMC2688069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.