Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19519879›Full record

ArticleBMC biology2009

Mutations in many genes affect aggressive behavior in Drosophila melanogaster.

Alexis C Edwards, Liesbeth Zwarts, Akihiko Yamamoto, Patrick Callaerts, Trudy F C Mackay

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 106 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. MasculinizedThe Journal of experimental biology · 2021
    Article
  14. TheFrontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. The Role of miRNAs inGenetics · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Alexis C EdwardsDepartment of Genetics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA. aedwards5@vcu.edu
Liesbeth Zwarts
Akihiko Yamamoto
Patrick Callaerts
Trudy F C Mackay
North Carolina State University · USKU Leuven · BE

Funding

Genetics of Aggression in DrosophilaR01GM076083 · NIGMS · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI ANHOLT, ROBERT R. H, MACKAY, TRUDY F. · 2006 to 2015
$2.4M
The Genetic Architecture of Aggressive BehaviorF31MH074161 · NIMH · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI EDWARDS, ALEXIS C · 2005 to 2007
$90k
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM-076083NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM076083NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH-074161NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH074161
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAggressive behavior in animals is important for survival and reproduction. Identifying the underlying genes and environmental contexts that affect aggressive behavior is important for understanding the evolutionary forces that maintain variation for aggressive behavior in natural populations, and to develop therapeutic interventions to modulate extreme levels of aggressive behavior in humans. While the role of neurotransmitters and a few other molecules in mediating and modulating levels of aggression is well established, it is likely that many additional genetic pathways remain undiscovered. Drosophila melanogaster has recently been established as an excellent model organism for studying the genetic basis of aggressive behavior. Here, we present the results of a screen of 170 Drosophila P-element insertional mutations for quantitative differences in aggressive behavior from their co-isogenic control line.

resultsWe identified 59 mutations in 57 genes that affect aggressive behavior, none of which had been previously implicated to affect aggression. Thirty-two of these mutants exhibited increased aggression, while 27 lines were less aggressive than the control. Many of the genes affect the development and function of the nervous system, and are thus plausibly relevant to the execution of complex behaviors. Others affect basic cellular and metabolic processes, or are mutations in computationally predicted genes for which aggressive behavior is the first biological annotation. Most of the mutations had pleiotropic effects on other complex traits. We characterized nine of these mutations in greater detail by assessing transcript levels throughout development, morphological changes in the mushroom bodies, and restoration of control levels of aggression in revertant alleles. All of the P-element insertions affected the tagged genes, and had pleiotropic effects on brain morphology.

conclusionThis study reveals that many more genes than previously suspected affect aggressive behavior, and that these genes have widespread pleiotropic effects. Given the conservation of aggressive behavior among different animal species, these are novel candidate genes for future study in other animals, including humans.

Indexed as

AggressionGenes, InsectMutagenesis, InsertionalAnimalsBehavior, AnimalDNA Transposable ElementsDrosophila melanogasterDNA Transposable Elements

Identifiers

PMID19519879
PMCPMC2707370
OpenAlexW2152234914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.