ArticleCurrent genomics2008
Meta Analysis of Gene Expression Data within and Across Species.
Article in Current genomics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Strengthening insights into host responses to mastitis infection in ruminants by combining heterogeneous microarray data sources.BMC genomics · 2011Pooled it
- Differential Expression Pattern of THBS1 and THBS2 in Lung Cancer: Clinical Outcome and a Systematic-Analysis of Microarray Databases.PloS one · 2016Article
- An Optimization-Driven Analysis Pipeline to Uncover Biomarkers and Signaling Paths: Cervix Cancer.Microarrays (Basel, Switzerland) · 2015Article
- Overexpression of collagen VI α3 in gastric cancer.Oncology letters · 2014Article
- CancerEST: a web-based tool for automatic meta-analysis of public EST data.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2014Article
- A developmental transcriptional network for maize defines coexpression modules.Plant physiology · 2013Article
- Functional adaptations of the transcriptome to mastitis-causing pathogens: the mammary gland and beyond.Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia · 2011Review
- Integrative computational biology for cancer research.Human genetics · 2011Review
- A guideline to family-wide comparative state-of-the-art quantitative RT-PCR analysis exemplified with a Brassicaceae cross-species seed germination case study.The Plant cell · 2011Article
- COMODO: an adaptive coclustering strategy to identify conserved coexpression modules between organisms.Nucleic acids research · 2011Article
- Query-based biclustering of gene expression data using Probabilistic Relational Models.BMC bioinformatics · 2011Article
- Article
- Immune response and mitochondrial metabolism are commonly deregulated in DMD and aging skeletal muscle.PloS one · 2011Article
- Recent advances in molecular technologies and their application in pathogen detection in foods with particular reference to yersinia.Journal of pathogens · 2011Article
- Expression breadth and expression abundance behave differently in correlations with evolutionary rates.BMC evolutionary biology · 2010Article
- Comparison study of microarray meta-analysis methods.BMC bioinformatics · 2010Article
- Protein Bioinformatics Infrastructure for the Integration and Analysis of Multiple High-Throughput "omics" Data.Advances in bioinformatics · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since the second half of the 1990s, a large number of genome-wide analyses have been described that study gene expression at the transcript level. To this end, two major strategies have been adopted, a first one relying on hybridization techniques such as microarrays, and a second one based on sequencing techniques such as serial analysis of gene expression (SAGE), cDNA-AFLP, and analysis based on expressed sequence tags (ESTs). Despite both types of profiling experiments becoming routine techniques in many research groups, their application remains costly and laborious. As a result, the number of conditions profiled in individual studies is still relatively small and usually varies from only two to few hundreds of samples for the largest experiments. More and more, scientific journals require the deposit of these high throughput experiments in public databases upon publication. Mining the information present in these databases offers molecular biologists the possibility to view their own small-scale analysis in the light of what is already available. However, so far, the richness of the public information remains largely unexploited. Several obstacles such as the correct association between ESTs and microarray probes with the corresponding gene transcript, the incompleteness and inconsistency in the annotation of experimental conditions, and the lack of standardized experimental protocols to generate gene expression data, all impede the successful mining of these data. Here, we review the potential and difficulties of combining publicly available expression data from respectively EST analyses and microarray experiments. With examples from literature, we show how meta-analysis of expression profiling experiments can be used to study expression behavior in a single organism or between organisms, across a wide range of experimental conditions. We also provide an overview of the methods and tools that can aid molecular biologists in exploiting these public data.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.