Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19516904›Full record

ArticlePloS one2009

First reported case of Cryptococcus gattii in the Southeastern USA: implications for travel-associated acquisition of an emerging pathogen.

Edmond J Byrnes, Wenjun Li, Yonathan Lewit, John R Perfect, Dee A Carter, Gary M Cox, Joseph Heitman

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Epidemiological Study ofVeterinary sciences · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Recent Trends in the Epidemiology of Fungal Infections.Infectious disease clinics of North America · 2021
    Review
  4. Small-molecule inhibitors for the Prp8 intein as antifungal agents.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  5. A case ofIDCases · 2021
    Article
  6. Review
  7. mBio · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Management of Cryptococcus gattii meningoencephalitis.The Lancet. Infectious diseases · 2015
    Review
  15. Lack ofCurrent medical mycology · 2015
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Cryptococcus gattii infections.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2014
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Edmond J ByrnesDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Wenjun Li
Yonathan Lewit
John R Perfect
Dee A Carter
Gary M Cox
Joseph Heitman
Duke Medical Center · USDuke University Hospital · USUniversity of Sydney · AU

Funding

ROLE OF CALCINEURIN IN C. NEOFORMANS MATING AND FRUITINGR01AI039115 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI HEITMAN, JOSEPH · 1997 to 2025
$6.7M
Genetics of Cryptococcus sexual reproductionR37AI039115 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI HEITMAN, JOSEPH · 2011 to 2020
$4.9M
Howard Hughes Medical Institute 55000640NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI039115NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI39115NIAID NIH HHS R37 AI039115
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2007, the first confirmed case of Cryptococcus gattii was reported in the state of North Carolina, USA. An otherwise healthy HIV negative male patient presented with a large upper thigh cryptococcoma in February, which was surgically removed and the patient was started on long-term high-dose fluconazole treatment. In May of 2007, the patient presented to the Duke University hospital emergency room with seizures. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed two large CNS lesions found to be cryptococcomas based on brain biopsy. Prior chest CT imaging had revealed small lung nodules indicating that C. gattii spores or desiccated yeast were likely inhaled into the lungs and dissemination occurred to both the leg and CNS. The patient's travel history included a visit throughout the San Francisco, CA region in September through October of 2006, consistent with acquisition during this time period. Cultures from both the leg and brain biopsies were subjected to analysis. Based on phenotypic and molecular methods, both isolates were C. gattii, VGI molecular type, and distinct from the Vancouver Island outbreak isolates. Based on multilocus sequence typing of coding and noncoding regions and virulence in a heterologous host model, the leg and brain isolates are identical, but the two differed in mating fertility. Two clinical isolates, one from a transplant recipient in San Francisco and the other from Australia, were identical to the North Carolina clinical isolate at all markers tested. Closely related isolates that differ at only one or a few noncoding markers are present in the Australian environment. Taken together, these findings support a model in which C. gattii VGI was transferred from Australia to California, possibly though an association with its common host plant E. camaldulensis, and the patient was exposed in San Francisco and returned to present with disease in North Carolina.

Indexed as

BrainCaliforniaCryptococcosisCryptococcusDisease OutbreaksGenotypeHumansMaleMiddle AgedMolecular EpidemiologyNorth CarolinaSerotypingSoutheastern United StatesThighVirulence

Identifiers

PMID19516904
PMCPMC2689935
OpenAlexW2084679354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.