Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19516895›Full record

ArticlePloS one2009

Cryptic subtelomeric rearrangements and X chromosome mosaicism: a study of 565 apparently normal individuals with fluorescent in situ hybridization.

Jasen L Wise, Richard J Crout, Daniel W McNeil, Robert J Weyant, Mary L Marazita, Sharon L Wenger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Possible influence of menstrual cycle on lymphocyte X chromosome mosaicism.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jasen L WiseDepartment of Pathology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA. jasenwise@gmail.com
Richard J Crout
Daniel W McNeil
Robert J Weyant
Mary L Marazita
Sharon L Wenger

Funding

Psychosocial Influences on Rural Children's Oral HealthR01DE014899 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI FOXMAN, BETSY, MARAZITA, MARY L. · 2002 to 2020
$39.9M
NIDCR NIH HHS 5 R01 DE 014899NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE014899
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Five percent of patients with unexplained mental retardation have been attributed to cryptic unbalanced subtelomeric rearrangements. Half of these affected individuals have inherited the rearrangement from a parent who is a carrier for a balanced translocation. However, the frequency of carriers for cryptic balanced translocations is unknown. To determine this frequency, 565 phenotypically normal unrelated individuals were examined for balanced subtelomeric rearrangements using Fluorescent In Situ hybridization (FISH) probes for all subtelomere regions. While no balanced subtelomeric rearrangements were identified, three females in this study were determined to be mosaic for the X chromosome. Mosaicism for XXX cell lines were observed in the lymphocyte cultures of 3 in 379 women (0.8%), which is a higher frequency than the 1 in 1000 (0.1%) reported for sex chromosome aneuploidies. Our findings suggest that numerical abnormalities of the X chromosome are more common in females than previously reported. Based on a review of the literature, the incidence of cryptic translocation carriers is estimated to be approximately 1/8,000, more than ten-fold higher than the frequency of visible reciprocal translocations.

Indexed as

MosaicismAgedAneuploidyCell LineChromosomes, Human, XFemaleHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceKaryotypingLymphocytesMaleMetaphaseMiddle AgedPhenotypeTelomereTranslocation, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID19516895
PMCPMC2688762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.