Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19515785›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology2009

Heterosexual transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 subtype C: Macrophage tropism, alternative coreceptor use, and the molecular anatomy of CCR5 utilization.

Jesse Isaacman-Beck, Emilia A Hermann, Yanjie Yi, Sarah J Ratcliffe, Joseph Mulenga, Susan Allen, Eric Hunter, Cynthia A Derdeyn, Ronald G Collman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Disparate impact on CD4 T cell count by two distinct HIV-1 phylogenetic clusters from the same clade.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jesse Isaacman-BeckUniversity of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, 19104-6060, USA.
Emilia A Hermann
Yanjie Yi
Sarah J Ratcliffe
Joseph Mulenga
Susan Allen
Eric Hunter
Cynthia A Derdeyn
Ronald G Collman

Funding

Virus & Reservoirs CoreP30AI045008 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ROBERT GROSS · 1999 to 2026
$78.6M
Virologic Correlates of Heterosexual TransmissionR01AI051231 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI ALLEN, TODD M, HUNTER, ERIC · 2002 to 2022
$9.9M
Virologic Correlates of Heterosexual TransmissionR37AI051231 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI HUNTER, ERIC · 2008 to 2017
$9.6M
Role of V1V2 in HIV transmission and pathogenesisR01AI058706 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI DERDEYN, CYNTHIA ANN · 2004 to 2016
$6.7M
Dual-Tropic HIV-1 Strains and Primary Cell InfectionR01AI035502 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI COLLMAN, RONALD G · 1998 to 2009
$2.9M
HIV-1 VPR IN INFECTION OF PRIMARY MACROPHAGESR29AI035502 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI COLLMAN, RONALD G · 1994 to 1997
–
NIAID NIH HHS AI35502NIAID NIH HHS AI51231NIAID NIH HHS AI58706NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI045008NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI035502NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI051231NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI058706NIAID NIH HHS R37 AI051231
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 transmission selects for virus variants with genetic characteristics distinct from those of donor quasispecies, but the biological factors favoring their transmission or establishment in new hosts are poorly understood. We compared primary target cell tropisms and entry coreceptor utilizations of donor and recipient subtype C Envs obtained near the time of acute infection from Zambian heterosexual transmission pairs. Both donor and recipient Envs demonstrated only modest macrophage tropism, and there was no overall difference between groups in macrophage or CD4 T-cell infection efficiency. Several individual pairs showed donor/recipient differences in primary cell infection, but these were not consistent between pairs. Envs had surprisingly broad uses of GPR15, CXCR6, and APJ, but little or no use of CCR2b, CCR3, CCR8, GPR1, and CXCR4. Donors overall used GPR15 better than did recipients. However, while several individual pairs showed donor/recipient differences for GPR15 and/or other coreceptors, the direction of the differences was inconsistent, and several pairs had unique alternative coreceptor patterns that were conserved across the transmission barrier. CCR5/CCR2b chimeras revealed that recipients as a group were more sensitive than were donors to replacement of the CCR5 extracellular loops with corresponding regions of CCR2b, but significant differences in this direction were not consistent within pairs. These data show that sexual transmission does not select for enhanced macrophage tropism, nor for preferential use of any alternative coreceptor. Recipient Envs are somewhat more constrained than are donors in flexibility of CCR5 use, but this pattern is not universal for all pairs, indicating that it is not an absolute requirement.

Indexed as

HeterosexualityCell LineCells, Culturedenv Gene Products, Human Immunodeficiency VirusFemaleHIV-1HIV InfectionsHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansMacrophagesMaleProspective StudiesReceptors, CCR5Receptors, HIVZambiaenv Gene Products, Human Immunodeficiency VirusReceptors, CCR5Receptors, HIV

Identifiers

PMID19515785
PMCPMC2715751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.