ArticleThe Lancet. Oncology2009
Predicting outcomes for children with neuroblastoma using a multigene-expression signature: a retrospective SIOPEN/COG/GPOH study.
Article in The Lancet. Oncology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 100 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
100 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular prognostic prediction for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma by support vector machine integrated approach.PloS one · 2012Trial
- The Role of Precision Medicine in Neuroblastoma: Targeted Therapies and Personalized Approaches-A Narrative Review.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Implementation and Validation of a Limiting Component Quantification Method for qPCR.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Analysis of qPCR Data: From PCR Efficiency to Absolute Target Quantity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Prediction of neuroblastoma prognosis with a novel T-cell exhaustion-related gene signature.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Sustained cancer-relevant alternative RNA splicing events driven by PRMT5 in high-risk neuroblastoma.Molecular oncology · 2025Article
- Novel pan-cancer T cell exhaustion signature forecasts immunotherapy response and unveils BCAP31 in macrophages as a therapeutic target in neuroblastoma.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Long Non-Coding RNAs in Neuroblastoma: Pathogenesis, Biomarkers and Therapeutic Targets.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Lineage specific transcription factor waves reprogram neuroblastoma from self-renewal to differentiation.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Introducing the fBMC bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Predicting Neuroblastoma Patient Risk Groups, Outcomes, and Treatment Response Using Machine Learning Methods: A Review.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Proteomic analysis of serum small extracellular vesicles identifies diagnostic biomarkers for neuroblastoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Article
- Development and validation of a 21-gene prognostic signature in neuroblastoma.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Signature literature review reveals AHCY, DPYSL3, and NME1 as the most recurrent prognostic genes for neuroblastoma.BioData mining · 2023Article
- Chromosome instability in neuroblastoma: A pathway to aggressive disease.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- Multi-omics integration reveals a six-malignant cell maker gene signature for predicting prognosis in high-risk neuroblastoma.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2022Article
- Evaluation validation of a qPCR curve analysis method and conventional approaches.BMC genomics · 2021Article
- The Role of Extracellular Vesicles in the Progression of Human Neuroblastoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- A G316A Polymorphism in the Ornithine Decarboxylase Gene Promoter Modulates MYCN-Driven Childhood Neuroblastoma.Cancers · 2021Article
40 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
36 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMore accurate prognostic assessment of patients with neuroblastoma is required to better inform the choice of risk-related therapy. The aim of this study is to develop and validate a gene-expression signature to improve outcome prediction.
methods59 genes were selected using an innovative data-mining strategy, and were profiled in the largest neuroblastoma patient series (n=579) to date using real-time quantitative PCR starting from only 20 ng of RNA. A multigene-expression signature was built using 30 training samples, tested on 313 test samples, and subsequently validated in a blind study on an independent set of 236 tumours.
findingsThe signature has a performance, sensitivity, and specificity of 85.4% (95% CI 77.7-93.2), 84.4% (66.5-94.1), and 86.5% (81.1-90.6), respectively, to predict patient outcome. Multivariate analysis indicates that the signature is a significant independent predictor of overall survival and progression-free survival after controlling for currently used risk factors: patients with high molecular risk have a higher risk of death from disease and higher risk of relapse or progression than patients with low molecular risk (odds ratio 19.32 [95% CI 6.50-57.43] and 3.96 [1.97-7.97] for overall survival and progression-free survival, respectively, both p<0.0001). Patients at an increased risk of an adverse outcome can also be identified in the current treatment groups, showing the potential of this signature for improved clinical management. These results were confirmed in the validation study, in which the signature was also independently statistically significant in a model adjusted for MYCN status, age, International Neuroblastoma Staging System stage, ploidy, International Neuroblastoma Pathology Classification grade of differentiation, and mitosis karyorrhexis index (odds ratios between 4.81 and 10.53 depending on the model for overall survival and 3.68 [95% CI 2.01-6.71] for progression-free survival).
interpretationThe 59-gene expression signature is an accurate predictor of outcome in patients with neuroblastoma. The signature is an independent risk predictor, identifying patients with an increased risk of poor outcome in the current clinical-risk groups. The method and signature is suitable for routine laboratory testing, and should be evaluated in prospective studies.
fundingThe Belgian Foundation Against Cancer, the Children Cancer Fund Ghent, the Belgian Society of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology, the Belgian Kid's Fund and the Fondation Nuovo-Soldati (JV), the Fund for Scientific Research Flanders (KDP, JH), the Fund for Scientific Research Flanders, the Institute for the Promotion of Innovation by Science and Technology in Flanders, Strategisch basisonderzoek, the Fondation Fournier Majoie pour l'Innovation, the Instituto Carlos III, the Italian Neuroblastoma Foundation, the European Community under the FP6, and the Belgian programme of Interuniversity Poles of Attraction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.