Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19515546›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in immunology2009

B cell acquisition of antigen in vivo.

Santiago F Gonzalez, Lisa A Pitcher, Thorsten Mempel, Franziska Schuerpf, Michael C Carroll

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in immunology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Material design for lymph node drug delivery.Nature reviews. Materials · 2019
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Lymph node cortical sinus organization and relationship to lymphocyte egress dynamics and antigen exposure.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Santiago F GonzalezImmune Disease Institute, Program in Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Children's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Lisa A Pitcher
Thorsten Mempel
Franziska Schuerpf
Michael C Carroll
Harvard University · USBoston Children's Hospital · USDecImmune Therapeutics (United States) · US

Funding

COMPLEMENT SYSTEM AND HUMORAL IMMUNITYR01AI039246 · NIAID · IMMUNE DISEASE INSTITUTE, INC. · PI CARROLL, MICHAEL CRAIG · 1996 to 2014
$6.1M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI039246
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The fate of B lymphocytes is dictated in large part by cognate antigen and the environment in which it is encountered. Yet we are only now beginning to understand where and how B cells acquire antigen. Recent studies identify multiple pathways by which lymph-borne antigens enter the B cell follicles of LNs. Size is a major factor as particulate antigens and large IC are bound by subcapsular sinus macrophages. By contrast, small antigens (under 70kDa) are rapidly channeled into follicles via conduits secreted by fibroblastic reticular cells (FRC). Interestingly, the conduits not only deliver antigen to follicular dendritic cells (FDC) but also provide a rich source of B cell chemokine, that is, CXCL-13. Thus, the follicular conduits provide an 'antigen highway' for B cells trafficking within the LN. These new findings provide an important discovery in understanding how B cells acquire cognate antigen.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigen PresentationAntigen-Presenting CellsAntigensBiological TransportB-LymphocytesHumansLymph NodesMicroscopy, ElectronModels, ImmunologicalAntigens

Identifiers

PMID19515546
PMCPMC2717615
OpenAlexW1994693508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.