Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19513941›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in investigational drugs (London, England : 2000)2009

Dendritic cells in immunotherapy of established cancer: Roles of signals 1, 2, 3 and 4.

Pawel Kalinski

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in investigational drugs (London, England : 2000), 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Tumor Immuno-Environment in Cancer Progression and Therapy.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. DNA is an efficient booster of dendritic cell-based vaccine.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2015
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Rapamycin augments human DC IL-12p70 and IL-27 secretion to promote allogeneic Type 1 polarization modulated by NK cells.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2013
    Article
  18. Immune system: a double-edged sword in cancer.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2013
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pawel KalinskiUniversity of Pittsburgh, Department of Surgery, The University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Hillman Cancer Center, Suite 1.46, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA. KalinskiP@upmc.edu
UPMC Hillman Cancer Center · US

Funding

Therapuetic Immune Targeting of EphA2 Expressed by Melanoma & Its Tumor-AssociateP50CA121973 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI KIRKWOOD, JOHN MUNN · 2008 to 2018
$22.9M
PROTEOMICS COREP01CA101944 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI LOTZE, MICHAEL T · 2005 to 2009
$8.5M
Type-1 Antigen Presenting Cells in CNS Tumors - Key to Efficient Anti-Tumor T-CelP01CA132714 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI KALINSKI, PAWEL · 2009 to 2013
$6.8M
Regulation of DC Activity by Memory and Effector CD8+ T CellsR01CA095128 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI KALINSKI, PAWEL · 2003 to 2010
$1.6M
Polarized DC as Melanoma Vaccine: Phase 1 EvaluationR21CA114931 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI KALINSKI, PAWEL · 2005 to 2006
$580k
NCI NIH HHS CA095128NCI NIH HHS CA101944NCI NIH HHS CA114931NCI NIH HHS CA121773NCI NIH HHS CA132714NCI NIH HHS P01 CA101944NCI NIH HHS P01 CA132714NCI NIH HHS P50 CA121973NCI NIH HHS R01 CA095128NCI NIH HHS R21 CA114931
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the ability of cancer vaccines to induce tumor-specific T-cells in the blood of patients with cancer, and early, promising data indicating their ability to delay cancer progression, their ability to induce cancer regression remains low. The use of ex vivo-generated dendritic cells (DCs) in such vaccines can help to sidestep the cancer-associated dysfunction of endogenous DCs and to deliver the key instructive signals needed for effective antitumor responses. Effective ways of loading DCs with tumor-related antigens, while retaining the high costimulatory function required for T-cell expansion (ie, effective delivery of 'signal one' and 'signal two'), have been previously identified. More recently, different DC populations have been found to deliver a specialized third signal, able to regulate the acquisition of desirable T-cell effector functions, as well as an additional fourth signal that regulates the homing properties of T-cells. Moreover, ex vivo instruction of DCs can be used to preferentially activate CTLs, T-helper 1 and NK cells, while limiting the undesirable activation of regulatory T-cells. These developments can result in the induction of T-cells with desirable effector functions and tumor-relevant homing properties, even in the absence of proinflammatory signals (typically present in recall infections, but not in advanced cancer), thus helping to bridge the gap between the effectiveness of therapeutic and preventive cancer vaccines.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigens, NeoplasmCancer VaccinesChemokinesDendritic CellsHumansModels, ImmunologicalNeoplasmsT-LymphocytesAntigens, NeoplasmCancer VaccinesChemokines

Identifiers

PMID19513941
PMCPMC2919813
OpenAlexW1497327881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.