Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19513790›Full record

ArticleMammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society

Imprint switch mutations at Rasgrf1 support conflict hypothesis of imprinting and define a growth control mechanism upstream of IGF1.

Nadia M Drake, Yoon Jung Park, Aditya S Shirali, Thomas A Cleland, Paul D Soloway

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The imprintedeLife · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nadia M DrakeCornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Yoon Jung Park
Aditya S Shirali
Thomas A Cleland
Paul D Soloway
Cornell University · US

Funding

NUTRITION TRAININGT32DK007158 · NIDDK · CORNELL UNIVERSITY ITHACA · PI PATRICIA A CASSANO, Julia L. Finkelstein · 1986 to 2026
$7.4M
Epigenetic Control of a Ras ActivatorR01CA098597 · NCI · CORNELL UNIVERSITY ITHACA · PI SOLOWAY, PAUL D · 2003 to 2011
$2.9M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA098597NCI NIH HHS R01CA098597NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007158NIDDK NIH HHS T32DK007158
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rasgrf1 is imprinted and expressed preferentially from the paternal allele in neonatal mouse brain. At weaning, expression becomes biallelic. Using a mouse model, we assayed the effects of perturbing imprinted Rasgrf1 expression in mice with the following imprinted expression patterns: monoallelic paternal (wild type), monoallelic maternal (maternal only), biallelic (both alleles transcribed), and null (neither allele transcribed). All genotypes exhibit biallelic expression around weaning. Consequences of this transient imprinting perturbation are manifested as overall size differences that correspond to the amount of neonatal Rasgrf1 expressed and are persistent, extending into adulthood. Biallelic mice are the largest and overexpress Rasgrf1 relative to wild-type mice, null mice are the smallest and underexpress Rasgrf1 as neonates, and the two monoallelically expressing genotypes are intermediate and indistinguishable from one another, in both size and Rasgrf1 expression level. Importantly, these data support one of the key underlying assumptions of the "conflict hypothesis" that describes the evolution of genomic imprinting in mammals and supposes that equivalent amounts of imprinted gene expression produce equivalent phenotypes, regardless of which parental allele is transcribed. Concordant with the difference in overall body size, we identify differences in IGF-1 levels, both in serum protein and as liver transcript, and identify additional differential expression of components upstream of IGF-1 release in the GH/IGF-1 axis. These data suggest that imprinted Rasgrf1 expression affects GH/IGF-1 axis function, and that the consequences of Rasgrf1 inputs to this axis persist beyond the time period when expression is restricted via epigenetic mechanisms, suggesting that proper neonatal Rasgrf1 expression levels are critical for development.

Indexed as

Genomic ImprintingMutationAnimalsBody SizeFemaleGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalInsulin-Like Growth Factor IMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLras-GRF1Insulin-Like Growth Factor Iras-GRF1Rasgrf1 protein, mouse

Identifiers

PMID19513790
PMCPMC2919583
OpenAlexW2069156037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.