ArticleBritish journal of cancer2009
Quantitative immunohistochemical expression of c Kit in breast carcinomas is predictive of patients' outcome.
Article in British journal of cancer, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Soluble KIT correlates with clinical outcome in patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with sunitinib.Journal of translational medicine · 2012Trial
- Additional prognostic value of polymorphisms within the 3'-untranslated region of programmed cell death pathway genes in early-stage breast cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- Expression of the Immunohistochemical Markers CK5, CD117, and EGFR in Molecular Subtypes of Breast Cancer Correlated with Prognosis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Evaluation of the Expression of HER2 and c-KIT Proteins as Prognostic Markers in Superficial Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma.Research and reports in urology · 2021Article
- C-Kit receptor and tryptase expressing mast cells correlate with angiogenesis in breast cancer patients.Oncotarget · 2018Article
- Nanotechniques Inactivate Cancer Stem Cells.Nanoscale research letters · 2017Article
- Estrogen induces c-Kit and an aggressive phenotype in a model of invasive lobular breast cancer.Oncogenesis · 2017Article
- Article
- The relevance of the intrinsic subtype to the clinicopathological features and biomarkers in Japanese breast cancer patients.World journal of surgical oncology · 2013Article
- Biofunctional characteristics of in situ and invasive breast carcinoma.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2013Article
- Article
- c-kit (CD117) expression in human tumors and its prognostic value: an immunohistochemical analysis.Pathology oncology research : POR · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundc Kit (CD117) expression in tissues has been reported as a relevant target for specific therapy in some human malignancies, but has been poorly documented in breast carcinomas.
methodsThe prognostic significance of c Kit in a series of 924 breast carcinomas (mean follow-up, 79 months) was investigated using standardised high-throughput quantitative densitometry of immunohistochemical precipitates in tissue microarrays.
resultsc Kit was expressed in 14.7% breast carcinomas (and in 42 out of 586 node-negative tumours). In univariate analysis, (log-rank test) the score of c Kit expression correlated with poor patient outcome P=0.02 and particularly in node-negative cases (P=0.002). In multivariate Cox analysis, c Kit was an indicator of metastasis independent of 25 other concomitantly evaluated markers of prognosis. Logistic regression showed that c Kit ranked 10 out of 25 (P=0.041), and was included in a 10-marker signature that allowed 79.2% of the patients to be correctly classified in the metastatic or metastasis-free categories independently of hormone receptors and HER-2 status. Interestingly, c Kit was also a significant predictor of metastasis in node-negative tumours (2 out of 25 ranking, P<0.0001) and included in a six-marker signature of prognosis, correctly classifying 88.6% of the patients (P<0.0001).
conclusionWe concluded that, as assessed by quantitative immunohistochemistry, c Kit is an independent prognostic indicator that could also potentially serve as a target for specific therapy in breast carcinomas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.