Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19506941›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of surgery2009

High-frequency gastric electrical stimulation for the treatment of gastroparesis: a meta-analysis.

Gregory O'Grady, John U Egbuji, Peng Du, Leo K Cheng, Andrew J Pullan, John A Windsor

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of surgery, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Acupuncture for symptomatic gastroparesis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  4. Clinical guideline: management of gastroparesis.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2013
    Guideline
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Ten controversies in gastroparesis and a look to the future.Neurogastroenterology and motility · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Nausea and Vomiting in 2021: A Comprehensive Update.Journal of clinical gastroenterology · 2021
    Review
  15. The Surgeon's Role in Gastric Electrical Stimulation Therapy for Gastroparesis.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2021
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Endoscopic Approaches to Gastroparesis.Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2020
    Article
  18. Diabetic Gastroparesis: A Review.Diabetes spectrum : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2020
    Article
  19. Importance of endoscopy during permanent gastric stimulator placement.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gregory O'GradyDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand. gog@ps.gen.nz
John U Egbuji
Peng Du
Leo K Cheng
Andrew J Pullan
John A Windsor

Funding

Realistic models of gastrointestinal bioelectromagnetismR01DK064775 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI CHENG, LEO · 2004 to 2014
$2.6M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK064775NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK64775
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND &

aimsHigh-frequency gastric electrical stimulation (GES) is a relatively new treatment for medically refractory gastroparesis. There have been a number of clinical studies based on the use of a high-frequency stimulator (Enterra, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN). A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate evidence for improved clinical outcome with this device.

methodsA literature search of major medical databases was performed for the period January 1992 to August 2008. Clinical studies involving an implanted high-frequency GES device were included and reported a range of clinical outcomes. Studies of external, temporary, and/or low-frequency GES were excluded.

resultsOf 13 included studies, 12 lacked controls and only one was blinded and randomized. Following GES, patients reported improvements in total symptom severity score (3/13 studies, mean difference 6.52 [confidence interval--CI: 1.32, 11.73]; P = 0.01), vomiting severity score (4/13, 1.45 [CI: 0.99, 1.91]; P < 0.0001), nausea severity score (4/13, 1.69 [CI: 1.26, 2.12]; P < 0.0001), SF-36 physical composite score (4/13, 8.05 [CI: 5.01, 11.10]; P < 0.0001), SF-36 mental composite score (4/13, 8.16 [CI: 4.85, 11.47]; P < 0.0001), requirement for enteral or parenteral nutrition (8/13, OR 5.53 [CI: 2.75, 11.13]; P < 0.001), and 4-h gastric emptying (5/13, 12.7% [CI: 9.8, 15.6]; P < 0.0001). Weight gain did not reach significance (3/13, 3.68 kg [CI: -0.23, 7.58]; P = 0.07). The device removal or reimplantation rate was 8.3%.

conclusionsResults show substantial benefits for high-frequency GES in the treatment of gastroparesis. However, caution is necessary in interpreting the results, primarily because of the limitations of uncontrolled studies. Further controlled studies are required to confirm the clinical benefits of high-frequency GES.

Indexed as

Electric Stimulation TherapyGastroparesisHumans

Identifiers

PMID19506941
PMCPMC4127311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.