ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2011
Population studies of 16 bovine STR loci for forensic purposes.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development of a 17-plex STR typing system for the identification of individuals and parentage testing in cattle.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Genetic Structure Analysis of 155 Transboundary and Local Populations of Cattle (International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Genetic Characterization of the Local Pirenaica Cattle for Parentage and Traceability Purposes.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020Article
- Perosomus elumbis in Danish Holstein cattle.BMC veterinary research · 2014Article
- Testing advances in molecular discrimination among Chinook salmon life histories: evidence from a blind test.Animal genetics · 2014Article
- Utilizing Indigenous Animal Genetic Resources-Based on Research Into Indigenous Cattle Breeds in the Basque Country in Northern Spain and Indigenous Pig Breeds in Vietnam.Animal science journal = Nihon chikusan GakkaihoReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As a consequence of the close integration of cattle into the food chain of humans, forensically relevant cases involving cattle (Bos taurus) DNA analysis are common. However, scientific publications reporting the information content of the commonly used bovine short tandem repeat (STR) loci remains scarce. Population studies were performed for 16 polymorphic STR loci (BM1818, BM1824, BM2113, CSRM60, CSSM66, ETH3, ETH10, ETH225, HAUT27, ILSTS006, INRA023, SPS115, TGLA53, TGLA122, TGLA126, and TGLA227) including 4,162 randomly selected cattle representing 20 distinct breeds. The power of parental exclusion, expected and observed heterozygosity, probability of identity, and non-amplifying ("null") allele frequencies were calculated. Major differences existed in the information content between different cattle breeds. The selection of 16 STR loci, partially recommended by International Society for Animal Genetics as the minimum standard needed for bovine STR typing, was sufficient for forensic analysis. Furthermore, the efficacy of the loci was assessed in assigning unknown individuals to the correct breed based on genotype data. The individual assignment tests provided excellent success in several breeds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.