Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19506845›Full record

ArticleNeuroradiology2009

Radiation dose from multidetector row CT imaging for acute stroke.

Anisa Mnyusiwalla, Richard I Aviv, Sean P Symons

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroradiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Infantile ischemic stroke secondary to profound arteriopathy.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. MR Perfusion in the Evaluation of Mechanical Thrombectomy Candidacy.Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anisa MnyusiwallaDepartment of Medical Imaging, Division of Neuroradiology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Richard I Aviv
Sean P Symons

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe objective of this study was to determine the radiation dose delivered during comprehensive computed tomography (CT) imaging for acute stroke.

methodsAll CT examinations performed over 18 months using our acute stroke protocol were included. Protocol includes an unenhanced CT head, CT angiography from the arch to vertex, CT perfusion/permeability, and an enhanced CT head. All imaging was acquired with a 64-MDCT. Examinations where any element of the protocol was repeated or omitted due to mistimed injection or patient motion were excluded. Dose-length products (DLP) for all components of each examination were obtained from dose reports generated at the time of acquisition, separating neck, and head calculations. Effective doses for each examination were calculated using the DLP and normalized values of effective dose per DLP appropriate for the body regions imaged.

resultsNinety-five examinations were included. Mean DLP was 6,790.0 mGy x cm. Effective doses ranged from 11.8 to 27.3 mSv, mean effective dose of 16.4 mSv. Mean effective dose for acquisition of the unenhanced head was 2.7 mSv. Largest contribution to effective dose was the CTA with a mean effective dose of 5.4 mSv. Mean effective dose for the CT perfusion was 4.9 mSv.

conclusionA comprehensive CT acute stroke protocol delivered a mean effective dose of 16.4 mSv, which is approximately six times the dose of an unenhanced CT head. These high-dose results must be balanced with the benefits of the detailed anatomic and physiologic data obtained. Centers should implement aggressive dose reduction strategies and freely use MR as a substitute.

Indexed as

Radiation DosageAcute DiseaseAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCerebral AngiographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPerfusion ImagingRadiometryStrokeTomography, X-Ray ComputedYoung Adult

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.