Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19506479›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in neurology2009

Multisite neuroimaging trials.

John Darrell Van Horn, Arthur W Toga

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in neurology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Investigation of Neurofunctional Changes Over the Course of Electroconvulsive Therapy.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Three Dimensions of Association Link Migraine Symptoms and Functional Connectivity.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

John Darrell Van HornDepartment of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095-7334, USA. jvanhorn@loni.ucla.edu
Arthur W Toga

Funding

Center for Computational Biology (RMI)U54RR021813 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI TOGA, ARTHUR W · 2004 to 2010
$25.3M
Informatics Meta-Spaces for the Exploration of Human NeuroanatomyRC1MH088194 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI VAN HORN, JOHN DARRELL · 2009 to 2010
$1000k
NCRR NIH HHS U54 RR021813NCRR NIH HHS U54RR021813NIMH NIH HHS RC1 MH088194
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe intent of this study is to review trends in multicenter neuroimaging trials and their value for research and implications for clinical treatment. RECENT

findingsThe rise in availability of MRI for detecting disorders in the living brain has made it an attractive technology for assessing neural structure and function in a number of prominent diseases. Geographic factors underlying diseased populations coupled with complementary neuroimaging research programs have led to an increase in multicenter neuroimaging trials and consortia. Neuroimaging has become a major focus for multiinstitutional research in progressive changes in brain architecture, proxy biomarkers of treatment response, and the effects of disease on patterns of cognitive activation and connectivity. Notable consortia and research trial studies have focused on Alzheimer's disease, pediatric brain cancer, and fetal alcohol syndrome, in addition to multiinstitutional collaborative programs for mapping the normal brain. Such large-scale efforts necessitate close coordination of image data collection protocols, ontology development, computational requirements, concerted data archiving, and sharing. SUMMARY: Multicenter neuroimaging trials, consortia, and collaboratives enable the acquisition of large-scale, purpose-driven datasets that can then be used by the broader community to model and predict clinical outcomes as well as guide clinicians in selecting treatment options for neurological disease.

Indexed as

Brain DiseasesClinical Trials as TopicCooperative BehaviorDatabases, FactualHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMulticenter Studies as Topic

Identifiers

PMID19506479
PMCPMC2777976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.