Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19505912›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2009

Prediagnosis reproductive factors and all-cause mortality for women with breast cancer in the breast cancer family registry.

Kelly-Anne Phillips, Roger L Milne, Dee W West, Pamela J Goodwin, Graham G Giles, Ellen T Chang, Jane C Figueiredo, Michael L Friedlander, Theresa H M Keegan, Gord Glendon and 6 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Breast Cancer Risk Factors and Survival by Tumor Subtype: Pooled Analyses from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Association of Parity and Time since Last Birth with Breast Cancer Prognosis by Intrinsic Subtype.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2016
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Oral contraceptive use and survival in women with invasive breast cancer.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2011
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Kelly-Anne PhillipsDivision of Haematology and Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Roger L Milne
Dee W West
Pamela J Goodwin
Graham G Giles
Ellen T Chang
Jane C Figueiredo
Michael L Friedlander
Theresa H M Keegan
Gord Glendon
Carmel Apicella
Frances P O'Malley
Melissa C Southey
Irene L Andrulis
Esther M John
John L Hopper

Funding

Northern California Cooperative Family Registry for Breast CancerU01CA069417 · NCI · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA CANCER CENTER · PI JOHN, ESTHER M. · 1995 to 2010
$22.4M
METROPOLITAN NEW YORK REGISTRY OF BREAST CANCER FAMILIESU01CA069398 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI TERRY, MARY BETH · 1995 to 2010
$10.5M
ONTARIO REGISTRY FOR STUDIES OF FAMILIAL BREAST CANCERU01CA069467 · NCI · CANCER CARE ONTARIO · PI ANDRULIS, IRENE L. · 1995 to 2010
$10.4M
Philadelphia Breast Cancer Family RegistryU01CA069631 · NCI · FOX CHASE CANCER CENTER · PI DALY, MARY BERYL · 1995 to 2010
$7.4M
THE AUSTRALIAN BREAST CANCER FAMILY REGISTRYU01CA069638 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE · PI HOPPER, JOHN L · 1995 to 2010
$6.6M
Utah Breast Cancer Family RegistryU01CA069446 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI BUYS, SAUNDRA S · 1995 to 2010
$4.6M
Prognosis in BRCA1 Associated Breast CancerR01CA102740 · NCI · SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM · PI GOODWIN, PAMELA J · 2005 to 2007
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS CA-06-503NCI NIH HHS R01 CA102740NCI NIH HHS R01 CA102740-01A2NCI NIH HHS U01 CA069398NCI NIH HHS U01 CA069417NCI NIH HHS U01 CA069446NCI NIH HHS U01 CA069467NCI NIH HHS U01 CA069631NCI NIH HHS U01 CA069638NCI NIH HHS U01 CA69398NCI NIH HHS U01 CA69417NCI NIH HHS U01 CA69446NCI NIH HHS U01CA69631NCI NIH HHS U01 CA69638NCI NIH HHS UO1 CA69467
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies have examined the prognostic relevance of reproductive factors before breast cancer diagnosis, but most have been small and their overall findings inconclusive. Associations between reproductive risk factors and all-cause mortality after breast cancer diagnosis were assessed with the use of a population-based cohort of 3,107 women of White European ancestry with invasive breast cancer (1,130 from Melbourne and Sydney, Australia; 1,441 from Ontario, Canada; and 536 from Northern California, United States). During follow-up with a median of 8.5 years, 567 deaths occurred. At recruitment, questionnaire data were collected on oral contraceptive use, number of full-term pregnancies, age at first full-term pregnancy, time from last full-term pregnancy to breast cancer diagnosis, breastfeeding, age at menarche, and menopause and menopausal status at breast cancer diagnosis. Hazard ratios for all-cause mortality were estimated with the use of Cox proportional hazards models with and without adjustment for age at diagnosis, study center, education, and body mass index. Compared with nulliparous women, those who had a child up to 2 years, or between 2 and 5 years, before their breast cancer diagnosis were more likely to die. The unadjusted hazard ratio estimates were 2.75 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.98-3.83; P < 0.001] and 2.20 (95% CI, 1.65-2.94; P < 0.001), respectively, and the adjusted estimates were 2.25 (95% CI, 1.59-3.18; P < 0.001) and 1.82 (95% CI, 1.35-2.46; P < 0.001), respectively. When evaluating the prognosis of women recently diagnosed with breast cancer, the time since last full-term pregnancy should be routinely considered along with other established host and tumor prognostic factors, but consideration of other reproductive factors may not be warranted.

Indexed as

Reproductive HistoryAdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPregnancyPrognosisRegistriesRisk FactorsTime

Identifiers

PMID19505912
PMCPMC2746957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.