Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19505888›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2009

Approaches to neuroscience data integration.

Kei-Hoi Cheung, Ernest Lim, Matthias Samwald, Huajun Chen, Luis Marenco, Matthew E Holford, Thomas M Morse, Pradeep Mutalik, Gordon M Shepherd, Perry L Miller

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Why Study the History of Neuroscience?Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2019
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kei-Hoi CheungCenter for Medical Informatics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06511, USA. kei.cheung@yale.edu
Ernest Lim
Matthias Samwald
Huajun Chen
Luis Marenco
Matthew E Holford
Thomas M Morse
Pradeep Mutalik
Gordon M Shepherd
Perry L Miller

Funding

SENSELAB: INTEGRATION OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY SENSORY DATAP01DC004732 · NIDCD · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SHEPHERD, GORDON · 2000 to 2008
$10.2M
Yale Microarray Center for Research the Nervous SystemU24NS051869 · NINDS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MANE, SHRIKANT M · 2005 to 2009
$6.9M
Mediated Integration of Neuroscience ResourcesR01DA021253 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MARENCO, LUIS N · 2006 to 2008
$970k
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA021253NIDCD NIH HHS P01 DC04732NINDS NIH HHS U24 NS051869
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the number of neuroscience databases increases, the need for neuroscience data integration grows. This paper reviews and compares several approaches, including the Neuroscience Database Gateway (NDG), Neuroscience Information Framework (NIF) and Entrez Neuron, which enable neuroscience database annotation and integration. These approaches cover a range of activities spanning from registry, discovery and integration of a wide variety of neuroscience data sources. They also provide different user interfaces for browsing, querying and displaying query results. In Entrez Neuron, for example, four different facets or tree views (neuron, neuronal property, gene and drug) are used to hierarchically organize concepts that can be used for querying a collection of ontologies. The facets are also used to define the structure of the query results.

Indexed as

Database Management SystemsDatabases, FactualInformation Storage and RetrievalInternetNeurosciencesSoftwareUser-Computer InterfaceVocabulary, Controlled

Identifiers

PMID19505888
PMCPMC2691938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.