Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19505177›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurotrauma2009

Injury modality, survival interval, and sample region are critical determinants of qRT-PCR reference gene selection during long-term recovery from brain trauma.

Janna L Harris, Thomas M Reeves, Linda L Phillips

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurotrauma, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Matrix metalloproteinase signals following neurotrauma are right on cue.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2019
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Janna L HarrisDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia 23298, USA.
Thomas M Reeves
Linda L Phillips
Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center · US

Funding

New Approaches to Axonal Protection After TBIR01NS057758 · NINDS · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI REEVES, THOMAS M. · 2007 to 2017
$3.3M
Matrix Metalloproteinases and Regenerative Plasticity Following Brain InjuryR01NS044372 · NINDS · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI PHILLIPS, LINDA L. · 2002 to 2011
$2.9M
Matrix Metalloproteinases and Regenerative Plasticity Following Brain InjuryR56NS044372 · NINDS · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI PHILLIPS, LINDA L. · 2007 to 2007
$373k
NINDS NIH HHS NS44372NINDS NIH HHS NS57758NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS044372NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS057758
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the present study we examined expression of four real-time quantitative RT-PCR reference genes commonly applied to rodent models of brain injury. Transcripts for beta-actin, cyclophilin A, GAPDH, and 18S rRNA were assessed at 2-15 days post-injury, focusing on the period of synaptic recovery. Diffuse moderate central fluid percussion injury (FPI) was contrasted with unilateral entorhinal cortex lesion (UEC), a model of targeted deafferentation. Expression in UEC hippocampus, as well as in FPI hippocampus and parietotemporal cortex was analyzed by qRT-PCR. Within-group variability of gene expression was assessed and change in expression relative to paired controls was determined. None of the four common reference genes tested was invariant across brain region, survival time, and type of injury. Cyclophilin A appeared appropriate as a reference gene in UEC hippocampus, while beta-actin was most stable for the hippocampus subjected to FPI. However, each gene may fail as a suitable reference with certain test genes whose RNA expression is targeted for measurement. In FPI cortex, all reference genes were significantly altered over time, compromising their utility for time-course studies. Despite such temporal variability, certain genes may be appropriate references if limited to single survival times. These data provide an extended baseline for identification of appropriate reference genes in rodent studies of recovery from brain injury. In this context, we outline additional considerations for selecting a qRT-PCR normalization strategy in such studies. As previously concluded for acute post-injury intervals, we stress the importance of reference gene validation for each brain injury paradigm and each set of experimental conditions.

Indexed as

ActinsAnimalsBiopsyBrainBrain InjuriesCyclophilin ADisease Models, AnimalGene Expression RegulationGenetic MarkersGlyceraldehyde-3-Phosphate Dehydrogenase (Phosphorylating)HippocampusMaleNerve Tissue ProteinsPredictive Value of TestsRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyActinsCyclophilin AGenetic MarkersGlyceraldehyde-3-Phosphate Dehydrogenase (Phosphorylating)Nerve Tissue ProteinsRNA, Ribosomal, 18S

Identifiers

PMID19505177
PMCPMC2850295
OpenAlexW2009745861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.