Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19504257›Full record

ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2010

QTL analysis of early stage heterosis for biomass in Arabidopsis.

Rhonda Christiane Meyer, Barbara Kusterer, Jan Lisec, Matthias Steinfath, Martina Becher, Hanno Scharr, Albrecht E Melchinger, Joachim Selbig, Ulrich Schurr, Lothar Willmitzer and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Inheritance ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2021
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Genomic architecture of biomass heterosis inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Genetic architecture of nonadditive inheritance in Arabidopsis thaliana hybrids.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Rhonda Christiane MeyerDepartment of Molecular Genetics, Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research, Corrensstrasse 3, 06466 Gatersleben, Germany. meyer@ipk-gatersleben.de
Barbara Kusterer
Jan Lisec
Matthias Steinfath
Martina Becher
Hanno Scharr
Albrecht E Melchinger
Joachim Selbig
Ulrich Schurr
Lothar Willmitzer
Thomas Altmann

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The main objective of this study was to identify genomic regions involved in biomass heterosis using QTL, generation means, and mode-of-inheritance classification analyses. In a modified North Carolina Design III we backcrossed 429 recombinant inbred line and 140 introgression line populations to the two parental accessions, C24 and Col-0, whose F (1) hybrid exhibited 44% heterosis for biomass. Mid-parent heterosis in the RILs ranged from -31 to 99% for dry weight and from -58 to 143% for leaf area. We detected ten genomic positions involved in biomass heterosis at an early developmental stage, individually explaining between 2.4 and 15.7% of the phenotypic variation. While overdominant gene action was prevalent in heterotic QTL, our results suggest that a combination of dominance, overdominance and epistasis is involved in biomass heterosis in this Arabidopsis cross.

Indexed as

Hybrid VigorQuantitative Trait LociArabidopsisBiomassGenome, PlantInbreedingPhenotype

Identifiers

PMID19504257
PMCPMC2793381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.