ReviewMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2010
Twilight effects of low doses of ionizing radiation on cellular systems: a bird's eye view on current concepts and research.
Review in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- MnSOD downregulation induced by extremely low 0.1 mGy single and fractionated X-rays and microgravity treatment in human neuroblastoma cell line, NB-1.Journal of clinical biochemistry and nutrition · 2015Article
- Low doses of gamma-irradiation induce an early bystander effect in zebrafish cells which is sufficient to radioprotect cells.PloS one · 2014Article
- Ataxia-telangiectasia: future prospects.The application of clinical genetics · 2014Review
- Germ cell intercellular bridges.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2011Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The debate about the health risks from low doses of radiation is vigorous and often acrimonious since many years and does not appear to weaken. Being far from completeness, this review presents only a bird's eye view on current concepts and research in the field. It is organized and divided in two parts. The first is dedicated to molecular responses determined by radiation-induced DNA ruptures. It focuses its attention on molecular pathways that are activated by ATM and tries to describe the variegated functions and specific roles of Chk2 and p53 and other proteins in sensing, promoting and executing DNA repair. The second part is more concerned with the risk associated with exposure to low dose radiation and possible effects that the radiation-affected cell may undergo. These effects include induction of apoptosis and mitotic catastrophe, bystander effect and genomic instability, senescence and hormetic response. Current hypotheses and research on these issues are briefly discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.