ArticlePloS one2009
Influence of protein abundance on high-throughput protein-protein interaction detection.
Article in PloS one, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed.
- Protein Stability, Turnover Kinetics, and Abundance Constrain the Scaling of Protein Interaction Networks.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- ANYI: The ANnotated Yeast Interactome.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Article
- Disease-specific interactome alterations via epichaperomics: the case for Alzheimer's disease.The FEBS journal · 2022Review
- Network Medicine-Based Unbiased Disease Modules for Drug and Diagnostic Target Identification in ROSopathies.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2021Article
- Evolution of Sequence-based Bioinformatics Tools for Protein-protein Interaction Prediction.Current genomics · 2020Review
- Precision medicine - networks to the rescue.Current opinion in biotechnology · 2020Review
- Integrating molecular networks with genetic variant interpretation for precision medicine.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine · 2019Review
- Novel insights into gene expression regulation during meiosis revealed by translation elongation dynamics.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2019Article
- Article
- Position Matters: Network Centrality Considerably Impacts Rates of Protein Evolution in the Human Protein-Protein Interaction Network.Genome biology and evolution · 2017Article
- Fundamentals of protein interaction network mapping.Molecular systems biology · 2015Review
- Deciphering Signaling Pathway Networks to Understand the Molecular Mechanisms of Metformin Action.PLoS computational biology · 2015Article
- A protein interaction map of the LSU processome.Genes & development · 2015Article
- Correcting for the study bias associated with protein-protein interaction measurements reveals differences between protein degree distributions from different cancer types.Frontiers in genetics · 2015Article
- Identification of additional proteins in differential proteomics using protein interaction networks.Proteomics · 2013Article
- Protein stickiness, rather than number of functional protein-protein interactions, predicts expression noise and plasticity in yeast.BMC systems biology · 2012Article
- Gene duplications contribute to the overrepresentation of interactions between proteins of a similar age.BMC evolutionary biology · 2012Article
- Diversity in genetic in vivo methods for protein-protein interaction studies: from the yeast two-hybrid system to the mammalian split-luciferase system.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2012Review
- Inferring high-confidence human protein-protein interactions.BMC bioinformatics · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Experimental protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks are increasingly being exploited in diverse ways for biological discovery. Accordingly, it is vital to discern their underlying natures by identifying and classifying the various types of deterministic (specific) and probabilistic (nonspecific) interactions detected. To this end, we have analyzed PPI networks determined using a range of high-throughput experimental techniques with the aim of systematically quantifying any biases that arise from the varying cellular abundances of the proteins. We confirm that PPI networks determined using affinity purification methods for yeast and Escherichia coli incorporate a correlation between protein degree, or number of interactions, and cellular abundance. The observed correlations are small but statistically significant and occur in both unprocessed (raw) and processed (high-confidence) data sets. In contrast, the yeast two-hybrid system yields networks that contain no such relationship. While previously commented based on mRNA abundance, our more extensive analysis based on protein abundance confirms a systematic difference between PPI networks determined from the two technologies. We additionally demonstrate that the centrality-lethality rule, which implies that higher-degree proteins are more likely to be essential, may be misleading, as protein abundance measurements identify essential proteins to be more prevalent than nonessential proteins. In fact, we generally find that when there is a degree/abundance correlation, the degree distributions of nonessential and essential proteins are also disparate. Conversely, when there is no degree/abundance correlation, the degree distributions of nonessential and essential proteins are not different. However, we show that essentiality manifests itself as a biological property in all of the yeast PPI networks investigated here via enrichments of interactions between essential proteins. These findings provide valuable insights into the underlying natures of the various high-throughput technologies utilized to detect PPIs and should lead to more effective strategies for the inference and analysis of high-quality PPI data sets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.