Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19503778›Full record

ReviewClinical interventions in aging2009

Use of anticoagulants in elderly patients: practical recommendations.

Helia Robert-Ebadi, Grégoire Le Gal, Marc Righini

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical interventions in aging, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03647254 (Effectivity of a Joint Didactic Intervention by School for Patients on Inappropriate Control Prothrombin Time Anticoagulated Patients. Protocol for Developing a Randomized and Controlled Clinical Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03647254 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Effectivity of a Joint Didactic Intervention by School for Patients on Inappropriate Control Prothrombin Time Anticoagulated Patients. Protocol for Developing a Randomized and Controlled Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorFrancisco Javier Navarro MoyaRan2018 to 2021Enrolled1ConditionsHealth Education, Patient Education as Topic, Blood Coagulation TestsArmsPatient education group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Proximal Tibia Fractures in Osteoporosis.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Enoxaparin 20 mg for thromboprophylaxis in severe renal impairment.The Journal of international medical research · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Helia Robert-EbadiDivision of Angiology and Hemostasis, Department of Internal Medicine, Geneva University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland. helia.robert-ebadi@hcuge.ch
Grégoire Le Gal
Marc Righini
Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Brest · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Elderly people represent a patient population at high thromboembolic risk, but also at high hemorrhagic risk. There is a general tendency among physicians to underuse anticoagulants in the elderly, probably both because of underestimation of thromboembolic risk and overestimation of bleeding risk. The main indications for anticoagulation are venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in medical and surgical settings, VTE treatment, atrial fibrillation (AF) and valvular heart disease. Available anticoagulants for VTE prophylaxis and initial treatment of VTE are low molecular weight heparins (LMWH), unfractionated heparin (UFH) or synthetic anti-factor Xa pentasaccharide fondaparinux. For long-term anticoagulation vitamin K antagonists (VKA) are the first choice and only available oral anticoagulants nowadays. Assessing the benefit-risk ratio of anticoagulation is one of the most challenging issues in the individual elderly patient, patients at highest hemorrhagic risk often being those who would have the greatest benefit from anticoagulants. Some specific considerations are of utmost importance when using anticoagulants in the elderly to maximize safety of these treatments, including decreased renal function, co-morbidities and risk of falls, altered pharmacodynamics of anticoagulants especially VKAs, association with antiplatelet agents, patient education. Newer anticoagulants that are currently under study could simplify the management and increase the safety of anticoagulation in the future.

Indexed as

Accidental FallsAgedAged, 80 and overAnticoagulantsAtrial FibrillationFactor XaFemaleHeart Valve DiseasesHemorrhagic DisordersHumansMaleRenal InsufficiencyRisk AssessmentVenous ThromboembolismAnticoagulantsFactor Xaanticoagulationatrial fibrillationelderly patientsfactor Xa inhibitorhemorrhagic riskthrombin inhibitorsvenous thromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID19503778
PMCPMC2685237
OpenAlexW2034882737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.