Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19503601›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2009

Asymmetric strand segregation: epigenetic costs of genetic fidelity?

Diane P Genereux

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Diane P GenereuxDepartment of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. genereux@u.washington.edu

Funding

Restoring FMRP Phenotypes Frpm Temporal Regional and Splice- Isoforms VarationsP30HD002274 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI GURALNICK, MICHAEL J · 1985 to 2013
$33.6M
INTERDISCIPLINARY TRAINING IN GENOMIC SCIENCEST32HG000035 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Bruce Colston Trapnell · 1995 to 2026
$24.2M
Shotgun Hairpin-Bisulfite PCR Reveals Genome Methylation and Sequence VariationR01GM077464 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI LAIRD, CHARLES D · 2006 to 2008
$773k
NHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG000035NHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG00035NICHD NIH HHS HD002274NICHD NIH HHS P30 HD002274NIGMS NIH HHS GM077464NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM077464
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Asymmetric strand segregation has been proposed as a mechanism to minimize effective mutation rates in epithelial tissues. Under asymmetric strand segregation, the double-stranded molecule that contains the oldest DNA strand is preferentially targeted to the somatic stem cell after each round of DNA replication. This oldest DNA strand is expected to have fewer errors than younger strands because some of the errors that arise on daughter strands during their synthesis fail to be repaired. Empirical findings suggest the possibility of asymmetric strand segregation in a subset of mammalian cell lineages, indicating that it may indeed function to increase genetic fidelity. However, the implications of asymmetric strand segregation for the fidelity of epigenetic information remain unexplored. Here, I explore the impact of strand-segregation dynamics on epigenetic fidelity using a mathematical-modelling approach that draws on the known molecular mechanisms of DNA methylation and existing rate estimates from empirical methylation data. I find that, for a wide range of starting methylation densities, asymmetric -- but not symmetric -- strand segregation leads to systematic increases in methylation levels if parent strands are subject to de novo methylation events. I found that epigenetic fidelity can be compromised when enhanced genetic fidelity is achieved through asymmetric strand segregation. Strand segregation dynamics could thus explain the increased DNA methylation densities that are observed in structured cellular populations during aging and in disease.

Indexed as

AnimalsDNADNA MethylationDNA ReplicationEpigenesis, GeneticHumansModels, TheoreticalDNA

Identifiers

PMID19503601
PMCPMC2684645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.