Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19500250›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology2009

The effect of genetic and environmental variation on metabolic gene expression.

Cinda P Scott, Dean A Williams, Douglas L Crawford

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Acclimation and acute temperature effects on population differences in oxidative phosphorylation.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2016
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The effect of short-term hypoxic exposure on metabolic gene expression.Journal of experimental zoology. Part A, Ecological genetics and physiology · 2012
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The role of gene expression in ecological speciation.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2010
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cinda P ScottDepartment of Marine Biology and Fisheries, Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami, 4600 Rickenbacker Causeway, Miami, FL 33149, USA.
Dean A Williams
Douglas L Crawford
University of Miami · USTexas Christian University · US

Funding

Pilot--Molecular Monitoring of Toxic DinoflagellatesS11ES011181 · NIEHS · FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY · PI REIN, KATHLEEN S · 2001 to 2011
$6.9M
Evolutionary &Functional Analysis of Microarray DataR01HL065470 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY · PI CRAWFORD, DOUGLAS L. · 2002 to 2005
$1.3M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL065470NIEHS NIH HHS S11 ES 11181
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

What is the relationship between genetic or environmental variation and the variation in messenger RNA (mRNA) expression? To address this, microarrays were used to examine the effect of genetic and environmental variation on cardiac mRNA expression for metabolic genes in three groups of Fundulus heteroclitus: (i) individuals sampled in the field (field), (ii) field individuals acclimated for 6 months to laboratory conditions (acclimated), or (iii) individuals bred for 10 successive generations in a laboratory environment (G10). The G10 individuals have significantly less genetic variation than individuals obtained in the field and had a significantly lower variation in mRNA expression across all genes in comparison to the other two groups (P = 0.001). When examining the gene specific variation, 22 genes had variation in expression that was significantly different among groups with lower variation in G10 individuals than in acclimated individuals. Additionally, there were fewer genes with significant differences in expression among G10 individuals vs. either acclimated or field individuals: 66 genes have statistically different levels of expression vs. 107 or 97 for acclimated or field groups. Based on the permutation of the data, these differences in the number of genes with significant differences among individuals within a group are unlikely to occur by chance (P < 0.01). Surprisingly, variation in mRNA expression in field individuals is lower than in acclimated individuals. Relative to the variation among individual within a group, few genes have significant differences in expression among groups (seven, 2.3%) and none of these are different between acclimated and field individuals. The results support the concept that genetic variation affects variation in mRNA expression and also suggests that temporal environmental variation associated with estuarine environments does not increase the variation among individuals or add to the differences among groups.

Indexed as

EnvironmentGenetics, PopulationGenetic VariationAcclimatizationAnimalsCluster AnalysisFemaleFundulidaeGene ExpressionGene Expression ProfilingMaleMicrosatellite RepeatsModels, GeneticOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisRNA, MessengerSex FactorsRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID19500250
PMCPMC2705469
OpenAlexW2005497427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.