Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19499287›Full record

ReviewThe journal of headache and pain2009

Migraine pain: reflections against vasodilatation.

Alessandro Panconesi, Maria Letizia Bartolozzi, Leonello Guidi

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The journal of headache and pain, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Alcohol and migraine: what should we tell patients?Current pain and headache reports · 2011
    Review
  11. Migraine is a neuronal disease.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2011
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Alcohol-induced headaches: Evidence for a central mechanism?Journal of neurosciences in rural practice
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Alessandro PanconesiHealth Authority 11, Empoli (Florence), Italy. a.panconesi@virgilio.it
Maria Letizia Bartolozzi
Leonello Guidi
Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale 11 di Empoli · ITRegional Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The original Wolff's vascular theory of migraine was supported by the discovery of a class of drugs, the triptans, developed as a selective cephalic vasoconstrictor agents. Even in the neurovascular hypothesis of Moskowitz, that is the neurogenic inflammation of meningeal vessels provoked by peptides released from trigeminal sensory neurons, the vasodilatation provoked by calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) is considered today much more important than oedema. The role of cephalic vasodilatation as a cause of migraine pain was recently sustained by studies showing the therapeutic effect of CGRP receptor antagonists. We discuss the evidence against vasodilatation as migraine pain generator and some findings which we suggest in support of a central (brain) origin of pain.

Indexed as

BrainCalcitonin Gene-Related PeptideHumansMigraine DisordersNeurogenic InflammationPainSerotoninVasoconstrictor AgentsVasodilationCalcitonin Gene-Related PeptideSerotoninVasoconstrictor Agents

Identifiers

PMID19499287
PMCPMC3452097
OpenAlexW2013757667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.