Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19498381›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Immunology2009

Membrane vesicles as conveyors of immune responses.

Clotilde Théry, Matias Ostrowski, Elodie Segura

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Immunology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2,091 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2,091citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
60.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2,091 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3,812 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Liquid biopsy in bladder cancer: towards precision oncology.Journal of translational medicine · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Apoptotic bodies in bone homeostasis and skeletal disease: biology and therapeutic implications.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2026
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. CSPG4Osteoarthritis and cartilage open · 2026
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Comparison of Methods for the Isolation of Salivary Extracellular Vesicles.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  20. Review

2,031 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Clotilde ThéryInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U932, Institut Curie, 26 Rue d'Ulm, Paris, 75005, France. clotilde.thery@curie.fr
Matias Ostrowski
Elodie Segura
Inserm · FRInstitut Curie · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In multicellular organisms, communication between cells mainly involves the secretion of proteins that then bind to receptors on neighbouring cells. But another mode of intercellular communication - the release of membrane vesicles - has recently become the subject of increasing interest. Membrane vesicles are complex structures composed of a lipid bilayer that contains transmembrane proteins and encloses soluble hydrophilic components derived from the cytosol of the donor cell. These vesicles have been shown to affect the physiology of neighbouring recipient cells in various ways, from inducing intracellular signalling following binding to receptors to conferring new properties after the acquisition of new receptors, enzymes or even genetic material from the vesicles. This Review focuses on the role of membrane vesicles, in particular exosomes, in the communication between immune cells, and between tumour and immune cells.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigen PresentationCell CommunicationCytoplasmic VesiclesEndocytosisExocytosisExosomesHumansLymphocytesMembrane ProteinsNeoplasmsSignal TransductionMembrane Proteins

Identifiers

PMID19498381
OpenAlexW1986321004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.