SynthesisAmerican journal of hypertension2009
Racial differences in blood pressure response to calcium channel blocker monotherapy: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in American journal of hypertension, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- 24-Hour ambulatory blood pressure response to combination valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide and amlodipine/hydrochlorothiazide in stage 2 hypertension by ethnicity: the EVALUATE study.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2010Trial
- Article
- The Evolving Role of Calcium Channel Blockers in Hypertension Management: Pharmacological and Clinical Considerations.Current issues in molecular biology · 2024Review
- Genetic heterogeneity in cardiovascular disease across ancestries: Insights for mechanisms and therapeutic intervention.Cambridge prisms. Precision medicine · 2023Review
- Antihypertensive Medication Use and Its Effects on Blood Pressure and Haemodynamics in a Tri-ethnic Population Cohort: Southall and Brent Revisited (SABRE).Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Article
- Association of West African ancestry and blood pressure control among African Americans taking antihypertensive medication in the Jackson Heart Study.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2020Article
- Pharmacogenetics in primary care: the promise of personalized medicine and the reality of racial profiling.Culture, medicine and psychiatry · 2013Article
- Lercanidipine in the Management of Hypertension: An Update.Journal of pharmacology & pharmacotherapeuticsReview
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundA systematic literature review was conducted to determine whether US blacks and whites have differential blood pressure (BP) response to calcium channel blocker (CCB) monotherapy.
methodsSix published studies made up the final cohort of eligible articles. Multiple treatment groups within some studies led to a total of eight sets of estimates for BP reduction with a total of 6,851 white or nonblack participants and 3,371 black participants.
resultsThe pooled difference in systolic blood pressure (SBP) change between blacks and whites was -2.7 mm Hg (95% confidence interval (CI): -4.0, -1.3) with blacks having greater response. The difference in diastolic blood pressure (DBP) between blacks and whites was -0.4 mm Hg (95% CI: -1.0, 0.3) with blacks having greater response. Using a dichotomous outcome measure, whites were found to be just as likely as blacks to attain the DBP goal of <90 mm Hg or a 10 mm Hg or greater change (relative risk: 1.00 95% CI: 0.91, 1.11). In addition, examination of the continuous distribution of BP responses of whites and blacks showed over 90% overlap in treatment response.
conclusionAssessment of differential response to CCB monotherapy by race in published data depends on choice of outcome metric. Nonetheless, the results of this systematic review indicate that BP response is qualitatively similar in US blacks and whites, suggesting that patient race is not likely to offer any clinical utility for decisions about the likely effect of this antihypertensive therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.