(Too) great expectations: the challenges in replicating asthma disease genes.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Single nucleotide polymorphisms in asthma candidate genesAsthma research and practice · 2018
   Article
2. Asthma-snapshot or motion picture?Frontiers in genetics · 2013
   Article
3. Assessing the validity of asthma associations for eight candidate genes and age at diagnosis effects.PloS one · 2013
   Article
4. The combination of a genome-wide association study of lymphocyte count and analysis of gene expression data reveals novel asthma candidate genes.Human molecular genetics · 2012
   Article
5. The genetics of asthma and allergic disease: a 21st century perspective.Immunological reviews · 2011
   Review

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Assessing the reproducibility of asthma candidate gene associations, using genome-wide data.2009

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as