Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19497008›Full record

ArticlePsychophysiology2009

Consider the context: blocked versus interleaved presentation of antisaccade trials.

Lauren E Ethridge, Shefali Brahmbhatt, Yuan Gao, Jennifer E McDowell, Brett A Clementz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychophysiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Control of the superior colliculus by the lateral prefrontal cortex.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2013
    Review
  9. Representing and retrieving video shots in human-centric brain imaging space.IEEE transactions on image processing : a publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society · 2013
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Evidence from cluster analysis for differentiation of antisaccade performance groups based on speed/accuracy trade-offs.International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology · 2012
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lauren E EthridgeDepartment of Psychology, Bio-Imaging Research Center, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602-3013, USA.
Shefali Brahmbhatt
Yuan Gao
Jennifer E McDowell
Brett A Clementz

Funding

MEG STUDIES OF P50 SUPPRESSION IN SCHIZOPHRENIAR01MH057886 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA (UGA) · PI CLEMENTZ, BRETT A · 2000 to 2007
$1.1M
NIMH NIH HHS MH57886NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH057886
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conclusions about the cognitive and neural requirements of saccade control may differ as a result of stimulus presentation method. This issue was examined in the current study by evaluating behavioral differences in pro- and antisaccade responses among 12 healthy young adults as a function of task presentation method, length of cue-to-target interval, and previous trial type. A 1-s cue-to-target interval fostered goal neglect, indicated by an increase in uncorrected errors and reaction times for "error" saccades. There was also a strong relationship between speed of visual orienting (prosaccade latencies) and failed inhibition (antisaccade errors) for the simultaneous condition. Interestingly, only the simultaneous condition produced task switch costs (on saccade latencies and error response percentages). The saccadic task presentation method, therefore, can influence conclusions about the cognitive operations supporting successful performance.

Indexed as

AdultCognitionCuesElectrooculographyFemaleHumansInhibition, PsychologicalMalePhotic StimulationPsychomotor PerformanceReaction TimeSaccadesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID19497008
PMCPMC4699845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.