ReviewDrugs2009
Newer therapeutic options for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy.
Review in Drugs, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04529291 (InertiaLocoGraphy as a Biomarker of Immunoglobulin Therapy Efficacy in Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
InertiaLocoGraphy as a Biomarker of Immunoglobulin Therapy Efficacy in Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Therapeutic options for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: a systematic review.BMC neurology · 2014Pooled it
- A Budget Impact Model of Maintenance Treatment of Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy with IgPro20 (Hizentra) Relative to Intravenous Immunoglobulin in the United States.PharmacoEconomics - open · 2023Article
- Chronic low-dose intravenous immunoglobulins as steroid-sparing therapy in myasthenia gravis.Journal of neurology · 2021Article
- Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder Treatment-Current and Future Prospects.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Association between chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy and gastrointestinal malignancies.Clinical journal of gastroenterology · 2021Review
- The Cost Effectiveness of Immunoglobulin vs. Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for CIDP.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Article
- Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy.Journal of neurology · 2020Article
- Severe Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy Ameliorated following High-dose (3 g/kg) Intravenous Immunoglobulin Therapy.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2019Article
- A randomised, multi-centre phase III study of 3 different doses of intravenous immunoglobulin 10% in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (ProCID trial): Study design and protocol.Journal of the peripheral nervous system : JPNS · 2018Article
- Intravenous immunoglobulin treatment in chronic neurological diseases: do we have maintenance dose right?Autoimmune diseases · 2014Article
- Treatment of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: from molecular bases to practical considerations.Autoimmune diseases · 2014Review
- Standard and escalating treatment of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2011Article
- Article
- Treatment of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy.Current treatment options in neurology · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is an immune-mediated disorder with variable symptoms and severity that can be difficult to diagnose. Intravenous immunoglobulin, plasma exchange and corticosteroids have all been proven to be beneficial in randomized controlled trials, although the proof for corticosteroids is less clear. Although these treatments are likely to be similar in efficacy, they differ in terms of their cost, availability and adverse effects. These characteristics should be taken into account when deciding which treatment to offer a patient. If there is no response to the first treatment option, one of the other treatments should be tried. Patients with a pure motor CIDP may deteriorate after corticosteroid treatment. Some patients do not respond or become refractory or intolerant to these conventional treatments. Those who become unresponsive to therapy should be checked again for the appearance of a monoclonal protein or other signs of malignancy. Over the years, small non-randomized studies have reported possible beneficial effects of various immunosuppressive agents. A Cochrane review concluded that currently there is insufficient evidence to decide whether these immunosuppressive drugs are beneficial in CIDP. When giving immunosuppressive drugs, one should be aware that some might even cause demyelinating disease. It is difficult to prove beneficial effects of these newer treatments since they have only been used in small groups of patients, who are refractory to other treatments, and often in combination with other treatments. CIDP patients can deteriorate during or after infections or improve spontaneously, making it more difficult to judge treatment efficacy. Various treatments for CIDP are described such as azathioprine, ciclosporin, cyclophosphamide, interferons, methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil, rituximab and etanercept. An overview of these newer treatments, their mode of action, adverse effects and potential place in the spectrum of treatments for CIDP based on previous reports and their level of evidence is given.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.