Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19496628›Full record

ReviewDrugs2009

Newer therapeutic options for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy.

Krista Kuitwaard, Pieter A van Doorn

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04529291 (InertiaLocoGraphy as a Biomarker of Immunoglobulin Therapy Efficacy in Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04529291 nawithdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

InertiaLocoGraphy as a Biomarker of Immunoglobulin Therapy Efficacy in Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy

TypeinterventionalSponsorFondation Hôpital Saint-JosephRan2022 to 2022Enrolled0ConditionsChronic Inflammatory Demyelinating PolyradiculoneuropathyArmsGroup with walking disorder, Group without walking disorder
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Treatment of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy.Current treatment options in neurology · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Krista KuitwaardDepartment of Neurology, Erasmus MC, s-Gravendijkwal 230, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. k.kuitwaard@erasmusmc.nl
Pieter A van Doorn
Erasmus MC · NLErasmus University Rotterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is an immune-mediated disorder with variable symptoms and severity that can be difficult to diagnose. Intravenous immunoglobulin, plasma exchange and corticosteroids have all been proven to be beneficial in randomized controlled trials, although the proof for corticosteroids is less clear. Although these treatments are likely to be similar in efficacy, they differ in terms of their cost, availability and adverse effects. These characteristics should be taken into account when deciding which treatment to offer a patient. If there is no response to the first treatment option, one of the other treatments should be tried. Patients with a pure motor CIDP may deteriorate after corticosteroid treatment. Some patients do not respond or become refractory or intolerant to these conventional treatments. Those who become unresponsive to therapy should be checked again for the appearance of a monoclonal protein or other signs of malignancy. Over the years, small non-randomized studies have reported possible beneficial effects of various immunosuppressive agents. A Cochrane review concluded that currently there is insufficient evidence to decide whether these immunosuppressive drugs are beneficial in CIDP. When giving immunosuppressive drugs, one should be aware that some might even cause demyelinating disease. It is difficult to prove beneficial effects of these newer treatments since they have only been used in small groups of patients, who are refractory to other treatments, and often in combination with other treatments. CIDP patients can deteriorate during or after infections or improve spontaneously, making it more difficult to judge treatment efficacy. Various treatments for CIDP are described such as azathioprine, ciclosporin, cyclophosphamide, interferons, methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil, rituximab and etanercept. An overview of these newer treatments, their mode of action, adverse effects and potential place in the spectrum of treatments for CIDP based on previous reports and their level of evidence is given.

Indexed as

AnimalsGlucocorticoidsHumansImmunoglobulins, IntravenousPlasma ExchangePolyradiculoneuropathy, Chronic Inflammatory DemyelinatingPrednisoloneRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSeverity of Illness IndexGlucocorticoidsImmunoglobulins, IntravenousPrednisolone

Identifiers

PMID19496628
OpenAlexW2082794526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.