Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19496626›Full record

ReviewDrugs2009

Strategies to control trachoma.

Anu A Mathew, Angus Turner, Hugh R Taylor

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Prevalence of nasopharyngealThe Lancet. Microbe · 2022
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Trachoma control: the SAFE strategy.International journal of ophthalmology · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Trachoma: Past, present and future.Journal of current ophthalmology · 2016
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anu A MathewCentre for Eye Research Australia, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Angus Turner
Hugh R Taylor
Centre for Eye Research Australia · AUThe Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital · AUUniversity of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Trachoma is a significant public health problem that is endemic in 57 countries, affecting 40.6 million people and contributing to 4% of the global burden of blindness. Repeated episodes of infection from Chlamydia trachomatis lead to long-term inflammation, scarring of the tarsal conjunctiva and distortion of the upper eyelid with in-turning of eyelashes that abrade the surface of the globe. This constant abrasion, in turn, can cause irreversible corneal opacity and blindness. The Alliance for the Global Elimination of Trachoma by 2020 (GET2020) has adopted the SAFE (Surgery, Antibiotics, Facial cleanliness and Environmental improvement) strategy as the main action against trachoma. Trichiasis surgery reduces the risk of blindness by reversing the in-turning of eyelashes and also improves the quality of life from non-visual symptoms. However, future efforts need to aim at increasing accessibility to surgery and improving acceptance. Antibacterials are required to reduce the burden of infection. Oral azithromycin is as close to the perfect antibacterial as we will get for mass distribution: it is safe, requires only a single oral dose, treatment is usually repeated every 6-12 months, resistance is not seen as a problem, and cost is not a limiting factor with a large donation programme and newer generic versions of the drug. Future focus should be on the details of antibacterial distribution such as coverage, frequency of distribution and target population. The promotion of facial cleanliness through education may be the key to trachoma elimination as it will stop the frequent exchange of infected ocular secretions and thus reduce the transmission of infection. However, innovative methods are required to translate health education and promotion activities into sustainable changes in hygiene behaviour. Environmental improvements should focus on the barriers to achieving facial cleanliness and cost-effective means need to be identified. There are a number of countries already eligible for certification of trachoma elimination and if current momentum continues, blinding trachoma can be eliminated by the year 2020.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBlindnessChlamydia trachomatisDrug Resistance, BacterialFaceHealth EducationHumansTrachomaWater SupplyWorld Health OrganizationAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID19496626
OpenAlexW1975202930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.