Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19495983›Full record

ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2009

Performance characteristics of a new generation pressure microsensor for physiologic applications.

Patrick S Cottler, Whitney R Karpen, Duane A Morrow, Kenton R Kaufman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Micromachined Optical Fiber Sensors for Biomedical Applications.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Internal pressure of human meniscal root attachments during loading.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2013
    Article
  11. Use of a Poroelastic Model to Predict Intramuscular Pressure.Poromechanics V : proceedings of the fifth Biot Conference on Poromechanics, July 10-12, 2013, Vienna, Austria. Biot Conference on Poromechanics (5th : 2013 : Vienna, Austria) · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Patrick S CottlerLuna Innovations, Inc., 706 Forest Street, Suite A, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA. cottlerp@lunainnovations.com
Whitney R Karpen
Duane A Morrow
Kenton R Kaufman

Funding

MICROSENSOR FOR INTRAMUSCULAR PRESSURE MEASUREMENTR01HD031476 · NICHD · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI KAUFMAN, KENTON R. · 1994 to 2014
$5.3M
Miniature Non-Invasive IOP Measurement DeviceR44EY013902 · NEI · LUNA INNOVATIONS, INC. · PI WAVERING, TOM A · 2005 to 2008
$825k
NEI NIH HHS 5R44EY013902-03NEI NIH HHS R44 EY013902NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD031476NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD31476
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A next generation fiber-optic microsensor based on the extrinsic Fabry-Perot interferometric (EFPI) technique has been developed for pressure measurements. The basic physics governing the operation of these sensors makes them relatively tolerant or immune to the effects of high-temperature, high-EMI, and highly-corrosive environments. This pressure microsensor represents a significant improvement in size and performance over previous generation sensors. To achieve the desired overall size and sensitivity, numerical modeling of diaphragm deflection was incorporated in the design, with the desired dimensions and calculated material properties. With an outer diameter of approximately 250 microm, a dynamic operating range of over 250 mmHg, and a sampling frequency of 960 Hz, this sensor is ideal for the minimally invasive measurement of physiologic pressures and incorporation in catheter-based instrumentation. Nine individual sensors were calibrated and characterized by comparing the output to a U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Traceable reference pressure over the range of 0-250 mmHg. The microsensor performance demonstrated accuracy of better than 2% full-scale output, and repeatability, and hysteresis of better than 1% full-scale output. Additionally, fatigue effects on five additional sensors were 0.25% full-scale output after over 10,000 pressure cycles.

Indexed as

PressureCalibrationFiber Optic TechnologyMicrotechnologySensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID19495983
PMCPMC2768899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.