ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2010
Does lack of routine postnatal examination on maternity unit increase the risk of hospital admission in the first week of life?
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe purpose of this study is to establish whether omitting routine postnatal examination on maternity units increases the risk of hospitalisation in the first week of life of the newborn. STUDY
designRetrospective analysis of maternal and baby details and paediatric admission data spanning 12 months in the setting of two maternity units and children's admission unit (CAU) at the University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK looking at all live-born babies not admitted to neonatal units (n = 7,058).
main outcome measuresFor babies within first week of life, main outcome measures are: (1) risk of the need to be assessed on CAU and (2) risk of hospitalisation for 48 h.
resultsBabies who had routine postnatal examination on maternity unit (n = 3,631) and babies who had no such examination (n = 3,427) had similar risks of the need to be seen on CAU (3% and 2.4%, respectively; p = 0.057) and of hospitalisation for 48 h (0.82% and 0.67%, respectively; p = 0.22). Babies born to first-time mothers and/or premature were more likely to have postnatal examination on the maternity unit and were at a higher risk of hospitalisation in the first week of life.
conclusionsWith prudent selection and extended surveillance of at-risk babies, lack of routine postnatal examination on maternity unit did not increase the risks of hospital review or admission in the first week of life. Worryingly, however, as many as 27% of all babies might not have had routine postnatal examination at all.
Indexed as
Identifiers
19495793What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.