Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19495553›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular evolution2009

RNase-based gametophytic self-incompatibility evolution: Questioning the hypothesis of multiple independent recruitments of the S-pollen gene.

Jorge Vieira, Nuno A Fonseca, Cristina P Vieira

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular evolution, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jorge VieiraInstituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular, University of Porto, Portugal.
Nuno A Fonseca
Cristina P Vieira

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple independent recruitments of the S-pollen component (always an F-box gene) during RNase-based gametophytic self-incompatibility evolution have recently been suggested. Therefore, different mechanisms could be used to achieve the rejection of incompatible pollen in different plant families. This hypothesis is, however, mainly based on the interpretation of phylogenetic analyses, using a small number of divergent nucleotide sequences. In this work we show, based on a large collection of F-box S-like sequences, that the inferred relationship of F-box S-pollen and F-box S-like sequences is dependent on the sequence alignment software and phylogenetic method used. Thus, at present, it is not possible to address the phylogenetic relationship of F-box S-pollen and S-like sequences from different plant families. In Petunia and Malus/Pyrus the putative S-pollen gene(s) show(s) variability patterns different than expected for an S-pollen gene, raising the question of false identification. Here we show that in Petunia, the unexpected features of the putative S-pollen gene are not incompatible with this gene's being the S-pollen gene. On the other hand, it is very unlikely that the Pyrus SFBB-gamma gene is involved in specificity determination.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenes, PlantModels, GeneticF-Box ProteinsGerm CellsPetuniaPhylogenyPlant ProteinsPollenPolymorphism, GeneticPyrusRecombination, GeneticRibonucleasesSelection, GeneticSequence Analysis, DNASequence Analysis, ProteinF-Box ProteinsPlant ProteinsRibonucleases

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.