ArticleBlood2009
Graded repression of PU.1/Sfpi1 gene transcription by GATA factors regulates hematopoietic cell fate.
Article in Blood, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
69 citing papers in PubMed, 108 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Review
- Review
- Advances in the characterization of in vitro-generated red blood cells: from biophysical properties to functional applications.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Review
- PU.1 and TGF-β signaling activate the cell-surface expression of CD103 in mast cells and dendritic cells: opposite roles of GATA2 in the expression of mucosal mast cell genes.The FEBS journal · 2025Article
- GATA2 decommissioning of enhancers: A mechanism to constrain inflammatory signaling.Cell reports · 2025Article
- A system-level model reveals that transcriptional stochasticity is required for hematopoietic stem cell differentiation.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2024Article
- Canalizing cell fate by transcriptional repression.Molecular systems biology · 2024Review
- GATA1 in Normal and Pathologic Megakaryopoiesis and Platelet Development.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024Review
- mTORC2 orchestrates monocytic and granulocytic lineage commitment by an ATF5-mediated pathway.iScience · 2023Article
- SATB1 Chromatin Loops Regulate Megakaryocyte/Erythroid Progenitor Expansion by Facilitating HSP70 and GATA1 Induction.Stem cells (Dayton, Ohio) · 2023Article
- Pathogenic human variant that dislocates GATA2 zinc fingers disrupts hematopoietic gene expression and signaling networks.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2023Article
- A genetically distinct pediatric subtype of primary CNS large B-cell lymphoma is associated with favorable clinical outcome.Blood advances · 2022Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Stage-specific action of Runx1 and GATA3 controls silencing of PU.1 expression in mouse pro-T cells.The Journal of experimental medicine · 2021Article
- NKL Homeobox Gene VENTX Is Part of a Regulatory Network in Human Conventional Dendritic Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- A mathematical model exhibiting the effect of DNA methylation on the stability boundary in cell-fate networks.Epigenetics · 2021Article
- PU.1 Mimic Synthetic Peptides Selectively Bind with GATA-1 and Allow c-Jun PU.1 Binding to Enhance Myelopoiesis.International journal of nanomedicine · 2021Article
9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
GATA-1 and PU.1 are essential hematopoietic transcription factors that control erythromegakaryocytic and myelolymphoid differentiation, respectively. These proteins antagonize each other through direct physical interaction to repress alternate lineage programs. We used immortalized Gata1(-) erythromegakaryocytic progenitor cells to study how PU.1/Sfpi1 expression is regulated by GATA-1 and GATA-2, a related factor that is normally expressed at earlier stages of hematopoiesis. Both GATA factors bind the PU.1/Sfpi1 gene at 2 highly conserved regions. In the absence of GATA-1, GATA-2 binding is associated with an undifferentiated state, intermediate level PU.1/Sfpi1 expression, and low-level expression of its downstream myeloid target genes. Restoration of GATA-1 function induces erythromegakaryocytic differentiation. Concomitantly, GATA-1 replaces GATA-2 at the PU.1/Sfpi1 locus and PU.1/Sfpi1 expression is extinguished. In contrast, when GATA-1 is not present, shRNA knockdown of GATA-2 increases PU.1/Sfpi1 expression by 3-fold and reprograms the cells to become macrophages. Our findings indicate that GATA factors act sequentially to regulate lineage determination during hematopoiesis, in part by exerting variable repressive effects at the PU.1/Sfpi1 locus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.