Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19490976›Full record

ArticleJournal of virological methods2009

Evaluation of two human immunodeficiency virus-1 genotyping systems: ViroSeq 2.0 and an in-house method.

S Saravanan, M Vidya, P Balakrishnan, P Balakrishanan, N Kumarasamy, Sunil S Solomon, S Solomon, Rami Kantor, David Katzenstein, Bharat Ramratnam and 1 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virological methods, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
    Balakrishanan, P [corrected to Balakrishnan, P]
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

S SaravananYRG Centre for AIDS Research and Education, Chennai 600 113, India.
M Vidya
P Balakrishnan
P Balakrishanan
N Kumarasamy
Sunil S Solomon
S Solomon
Rami Kantor
David Katzenstein
Bharat Ramratnam
Kenneth H Mayer

Funding

HIV-1 Drug Resistance in Different SubtypesR01AI066922 · NIAID · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI KANTOR, RAMI, KATZENSTEIN, DAVID ALLENBERG · 2008 to 2012
$3.6M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI066922
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Commercial HIV-1 genotypic resistance assays are very expensive, particularly for use in resource-constrained settings like India. Hence a cost effective in-house assay for drug resistance was validated against the standard ViroSeq HIV-1 Genotyping System 2.0 (Celera Diagnostics, CA, USA). A total of 50 samples were used for this evaluation (21 proficiency panels and 29 clinical isolates). Known resistance positions within HIV-1 protease (PR) region (1-99 codons) and HIV-1 reverse-transcriptase (RT) region (1-240 codons) were included. The results were analysed for each codon as follows: (i) concordant; (ii) partially concordant; (iii) indeterminate and (iv) discordant. A total of 2750 codons (55 codons per patient samplex50 samples) associated with drug resistance (1050 PR and 1700 RT) were analysed. For PR, 99% of the codon results were concordant and 1% were partially concordant. For RT, 99% of the codon results were concordant, 0.9% were partially concordant and 0.1% were discordant. No indeterminate results were observed and the results were reproducible. Overall, the in-house assay provided comparable results to those of US FDA approved ViroSeq, which costs about a half of the commercial assay ($ 100 vs. $ 230), making it suitable for resource-limited settings.

Indexed as

GenotypeHIV-1HIV InfectionsHumansIndiaMicrobial Sensitivity TestsRNA, ViralSensitivity and SpecificityRNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID19490976
PMCPMC2923210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.