ReviewVeterinary dermatology2009
Nonhuman primate dermatology: a literature review.
Review in Veterinary dermatology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- High parasitism by Primasubulura jacchi (Ascaridida: Subuluridae) and infestation of Rhipicephalus sanguineus sensu lato (Acari: Ixodidae) in Callithrix jacchus (Primates: Callitrichidae) in Northeastern Brazil.Veterinary research communications · 2026Article
- Customized Open Patch Allergen Testing in a Rhesus Macaque (Macaca mulatta).Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2026Article
- An Epidemiologic Study of Bacterial Culture and Antibiotic Susceptibility Analyses in Captive Macaques and Marmosets at the Wisconsin National Primate Research Center.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2024Article
- International Harmonization of Nomenclature and Diagnostic Criteria (INHAND): Non-proliferative and Proliferative Lesions of the Non-human Primate (Journal of toxicologic pathology · 2021Review
- Social hair pulling in captive rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta).American journal of primatology · 2017Article
- Are humans the initial source of canine mange?Parasites & vectors · 2016Article
- Response to Jablonski and Chaplin.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2014Article
- Skin cancer was not a potent selective force in the evolution of protective pigmentation in early hominins.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2014Article
- A simple alopecia scoring system for use in colony management of laboratory-housed primates.Journal of medical primatology · 2014Article
- Psychogenic alopecia in rhesus macaques presenting as focally extensive alopecia of the distal limb.Comparative medicine · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In general, veterinary dermatologists do not have extensive clinical experience of nonhuman primate (NHP) dermatoses. The bulk of the published literature does not provide an organized evidence-based approach to the NHP dermatologic case. The veterinary dermatologist is left to extract information from both human and veterinary dermatology, an approach that can be problematic as it forces the clinician to make diagnostic and therapeutic decisions based on two very disparate bodies of literature. A more cohesive approach to NHP dermatology - without relying on assumptions that NHP pathology most commonly behaves similarly to other veterinary and human disease - is required. This review of the dermatology of NHP species includes discussions of primary dermatoses, as well as diseases where dermatologic signs represent a significant secondary component, provides a first step towards encouraging the veterinary community to study and report the dermatologic diseases of nonhuman primates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.