ArticleClinical & experimental metastasis2009
Comparative analysis of tumorbiology and CD133 positivity in primary and recurrent pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Article in Clinical & experimental metastasis, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- CXCR4--A Prognostic and Clinicopathological Biomarker for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Meta-Analysis.PloS one · 2015Pooled it
- Prognostic value of cancer stem cell marker CD133 expression in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC): a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2015Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Expressions of ABCG2, CD133, and podoplanin in salivary adenoid cystic carcinoma.BioMed research international · 2014Trial
- Resveratrol enhances the chemotherapeutic response and reverses the stemness induced by gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer cells via targeting SREBP1.Cell proliferation · 2019Article
- Ten hub genes associated with progression and prognosis of pancreatic carcinoma identified by co-expression analysis.International journal of biological sciences · 2018Article
- Polyplex-mediated inhibition of chemokine receptor CXCR4 and chromatin-remodeling enzyme NCOA3 impedes pancreatic cancer progression and metastasis.Biomaterials · 2016Article
- Identification of a novel subpopulation of tumor-initiating cells from gemcitabine-resistant pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients.PloS one · 2013Article
- Article
- Visualization of CD44 and CD133 in normal pancreas and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas: non-overlapping membrane expression in cell populations positive for both markers.The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society · 2011Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In over 70% of the cases, patients with curative surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) develop recurrent tumors. The cancer stem cell (CSC) hypothesis suggests that CSCs are chemoresistant and enriched in recurrent tumors. This study analyzes tumorbiology, expression of the metastasis-promoting CXCR4 and actinin-4, and of the CSC marker CD133 in primary and recurrent PDAC. Twenty-six patients underwent resection for primary and recurrent PDAC and most developed tumor recurrence within 2 years. In 81% the histologic tumor grade was unchanged. Immunohistochemistry could be performed with 15 pairs of primary and recurrent PDAC. The mean Ki-67 proliferation index increased (P = 0.06). About 30% of tumor cells were positive for CXCR4 and almost all tumor cells expressed actinin-4, but there were neither significant changes in the expression levels in recurrent PDAC, nor specifically enhanced levels in metastases. The prominent CD133 pattern was an apical membrane staining of inflammatorily altered, non-neoplastic ductal structures equally observed in primary and recurrent PDAC. The membrane CD133 positivity was consistently absent in neoplastic PDAC cells. Cytoplasmic CD133 positivity was extremely rare (0.85 and 0.34 cells/cm(2) in primary and recurrent PDAC, respectively; P = 0.07). Tumor grade is mainly unchanged and the expression of CXCR4, actinin-4 and CD133 are not enhanced in recurrent PDAC. The apical membrane CD133 positivity of normal and inflammatorily altered ductal structures and its lack in tumor cells bring the role of CD133 as a specific CSC marker in PDAC into question.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.