Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19487476›Full record

ArticleInfection and immunity2009

Viral booster vaccines improve Mycobacterium bovis BCG-induced protection against bovine tuberculosis.

H Martin Vordermeier, Bernardo Villarreal-Ramos, Paul J Cockle, Martin McAulay, Shelley G Rhodes, Tyler Thacker, Sarah C Gilbert, Helen McShane, Adrian V S Hill, Zhou Xing and 1 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and immunity, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 131 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
131citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
11.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

131 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 242 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Trained immunity in farm animals.Veterinary research · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Cytokines as potential biomarkers for the diagnosis ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Safety and Immunogenicity of RecombinantInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  20. Article

71 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

H Martin VordermeierTB Research Group, VLA-Weybridge, New Haw, Addlestone, Surrey, United Kingdom. m.vordermeier@vla.defra.gsi.gov.uk
Bernardo Villarreal-Ramos
Paul J Cockle
Martin McAulay
Shelley G Rhodes
Tyler Thacker
Sarah C Gilbert
Helen McShane
Adrian V S Hill
Zhou Xing
R Glyn Hewinson
Veterinary Medicines Directorate · GBThe Pirbright Institute · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBJenner Institute · GBMcMaster University Medical Centre · CAUnited States Department of Agriculture · US

Funding

Wellcome Trust 076943
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous work with small-animal laboratory models of tuberculosis has shown that vaccination strategies based on heterologous prime-boost protocols using Mycobacterium bovis bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) to prime and modified vaccinia virus Ankara strain (MVA85A) or recombinant attenuated adenoviruses (Ad85A) expressing the mycobacterial antigen Ag85A to boost may increase the protective efficacy of BCG. Here we report the first efficacy data on using these vaccines in cattle, a natural target species of tuberculous infection. Protection was determined by measuring development of disease as an end point after M. bovis challenge. Either Ad85A or MVA85A boosting resulted in protection superior to that given by BCG alone: boosting BCG with MVA85A or Ad85A induced significant reduction in pathology in four/eight parameters assessed, while BCG vaccination alone did so in only one parameter studied. Protection was particularly evident in the lungs of vaccinated animals (median lung scores for naïve and BCG-, BCG/MVA85A-, and BCG/Ad85A-vaccinated animals were 10.5, 5, 2.5, and 0, respectively). The bacterial loads in lymph node tissues were also reduced after viral boosting of BCG-vaccinated calves compared to those in BCG-only-vaccinated animals. Analysis of vaccine-induced immunity identified memory responses measured by cultured enzyme-linked immunospot assay as well as in vitro interleukin-17 production as predictors of vaccination success, as both responses, measured before challenge, correlated positively with the degree of protection. Therefore, this study provides evidence of improved protection against tuberculosis by viral booster vaccination in a natural target species and has prioritized potential correlates of vaccine efficacy for further evaluation. These findings also have implications for human tuberculosis vaccine development.

Indexed as

Genetic VectorsAcyltransferasesAdenoviridaeAnimalsAntigens, BacterialCattleImmunization, SecondaryInterleukin-17Leukocytes, MononuclearLungLymph NodesSeverity of Illness IndexTuberculosis, BovineTuberculosis VaccinesVaccinia virusAcyltransferasesantigen 85A, Mycobacterium tuberculosisAntigens, BacterialInterleukin-17Tuberculosis Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID19487476
PMCPMC2715681
OpenAlexW2156503894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.