Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19487190›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2009

Relative time sharing: new findings and an extension of the resource allocation model of temporal processing.

Catalin V Buhusi, Warren H Meck

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. The Role of the Serotonergic System in Time Perception: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Dopamine and the interdependency of time perception and reward.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. The Persistence of Memory: How the Brain Encodes Time in Memory.Current opinion in behavioral sciences · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Catalin V BuhusiDepartment of Neurosciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29464, USA. buhusi@musc.edu
Warren H Meck

Funding

ATTENTIONAL PROCESSING OF TEMPORAL INFORMATIONR01MH065561 · NIMH · UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BUHUSI, CATALIN V. · 2002 to 2013
$2.0M
REPRESENTATION OF TEMPORAL INFORMATIONR01MH073057 · NIMH · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI BUHUSI, CATALIN V. · 2006 to 2009
$824k
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH 065561NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH065561NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH 073057NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH073057
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individuals time as if using a stopwatch that can be stopped or reset on command. Here, we review behavioural and neurobiological data supporting the time-sharing hypothesis that perceived time depends on the attentional and memory resources allocated to the timing process. Neuroimaging studies in humans suggest that timekeeping tasks engage brain circuits typically involved in attention and working memory. Behavioural, pharmacological, lesion and electrophysiological studies in lower animals support this time-sharing hypothesis. When subjects attend to a second task, or when intruder events are presented, estimated durations are shorter, presumably due to resources being taken away from timing. Here, we extend the time-sharing hypothesis by proposing that resource reallocation is proportional to the perceived contrast, both in temporal and non-temporal features, between intruders and the timed events. New findings support this extension by showing that the effect of an intruder event is dependent on the relative duration of the intruder to the intertrial interval. The conclusion is that the brain circuits engaged by timekeeping comprise not only those primarily involved in time accumulation, but also those involved in the maintenance of attentional and memory resources for timing, and in the monitoring and reallocation of those resources among tasks.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAnimalsAttentionBrainHumansMemoryTime Perception

Identifiers

PMID19487190
PMCPMC2685821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.