ArticleBiophysical journal2009
Association of helical beta-peptides and their aggregation behavior from the potential of mean force in explicit solvent.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploration of conformational transition in the aryl-binding site of human FXa using molecular dynamics simulations.Journal of molecular modeling · 2012Article
- Dimerization of helical β-peptides in solution.Biophysical journal · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Helical beta-peptides have been shown to fold into well-defined structures. In aqueous solution, some beta-peptides self-assemble into nanoscale fibers, aggregates, and liquid crystalline phases. Molecular simulations, at an atomistic level, are used to examine, in a systematic manner, the interactions between distinct beta-peptide molecules. The relationship between side-chain chemistry (and position along the backbone) and, in particular, aggregation behaviors, is assessed by calculating the potential of mean force or dimerization free energy of two peptides in explicit water. The free energy profiles as a function of separation for helical, amphiphilic beta-peptides are consistent with experimental observations, and help explain the origins of aggregate or fiber formation in solution. Close examination of the energetic and entropic contributions to the free energy reveals that, depending on the position of certain side groups along the molecule, the tendency of two peptides to aggregate can be driven by entropy or by energy, respectively. In contrast to findings from previous works that employed a coarse representation of the solvent, it is shown that water-peptide interactions play key roles in the association behavior of beta-peptides.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.