ArticleSurgical endoscopy1991
Endosonographic detection of rectum anastomoses.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 1991. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Following preliminary studies on 15 pig-bowel EEA anastomoses, anastomoses in 20 patients were consecutively examined between the 12th and 14th days after anterior rectum or sigmoid resection. Resections were performed on 16 patients for a malignant tumour and on 4 individuals for a benign lesion. The examination programme included detailed clinical examination of the patient, digital palpation, rectoscopy and endorectal sonography, as well as radiographic examination of the large bowel using aqueous contrast medium 1 day later. All rectoscopic and X-ray findings of anastomotic insufficiency were confirmed by means of endosonography. The sensitivity of the latter technique in verifying the radiographic detection of an insufficiency was 1 and its specificity was 0.82. Endorectal sonographic detection of an anastomotic insufficiency was successful in six cases, and suspected insufficiency was noted on three occasions. Radiographic detection of insufficiency was confirmed in three patients; radiographic results suggested an insufficiency in two cases. On one occasion, a suture insufficiency was confirmed by an immediate operation carried out without a radiographic examination. The present study shows that accurate detection of a suture insufficiency after deep resection is possible with the aid of endorectal sonography.
Indexed as
Identifiers
1948620What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.