Evidence map›Paper›PMID 1948620›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy1991

Endosonographic detection of rectum anastomoses.

K Dresing, W Stock

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 1991. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

K DresingChirurgische Abteilung, Marien-Hospital, Düsseldorf, Federal Republic of Germany.
W Stock

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following preliminary studies on 15 pig-bowel EEA anastomoses, anastomoses in 20 patients were consecutively examined between the 12th and 14th days after anterior rectum or sigmoid resection. Resections were performed on 16 patients for a malignant tumour and on 4 individuals for a benign lesion. The examination programme included detailed clinical examination of the patient, digital palpation, rectoscopy and endorectal sonography, as well as radiographic examination of the large bowel using aqueous contrast medium 1 day later. All rectoscopic and X-ray findings of anastomotic insufficiency were confirmed by means of endosonography. The sensitivity of the latter technique in verifying the radiographic detection of an insufficiency was 1 and its specificity was 0.82. Endorectal sonographic detection of an anastomotic insufficiency was successful in six cases, and suspected insufficiency was noted on three occasions. Radiographic detection of insufficiency was confirmed in three patients; radiographic results suggested an insufficiency in two cases. On one occasion, a suture insufficiency was confirmed by an immediate operation carried out without a radiographic examination. The present study shows that accurate detection of a suture insufficiency after deep resection is possible with the aid of endorectal sonography.

Indexed as

UltrasonographyAnastomosis, SurgicalAnimalsColon, SigmoidDiverticulitisEvaluation Studies as TopicFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingProspective StudiesRectal NeoplasmsRectumSigmoid NeoplasmsSurgical Wound Dehiscence

Identifiers

PMID1948620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.